Back when I did it, they offered human analysis of an extended sound sample and detailed suggestions if they found problems.
“Your sound file is perfect, you can’t announce, don’t give up the day job.”
Words to live by.
Then the pandemic happened, everybody on the surface of the planet decided to read for audiobooks, and half the staff called in sick. They now offer ACX AudioLab which produces automatic, human-free analysis and a close cousin to Audacity’s own ACX-Check except we check noise and they don’t—or didn’t last I checked.
Noise is notable because home performers never pass noise. “Studio quiet” is right out of normal people’s experience. Right this second I can hear my computer fan, the fridge, two birds, one dog, and the traffic outside. Not a studio.
Nowhere in the new automated testing does anybody listen to the work until the final submission, so there is no theatrical testing ahead of time—unless you wish to submit samples to the forum. We can catch some of the obvious mistakes. Also note the theatrical test is what I failed.
Yes, you are expected to produce and submit perfect sound files. Depending on what they find wrong, you may hit the automated tester first which may or may not offer suggestions or hints what it found wrong. I suspect Room Tone Management is automated. It wouldn’t be that hard. There may be other things wrong, too.
There is a New User problem that may pop up here. What form are your Edit Master chapters? Audacity Projects or WAV (Microsoft) sound files? You can’t “fix” an MP3 file. If you open a 192 quality MP3 file to correct it, you won’t have 192 quality any more when you export the new file. You can’t submit that, sorry. You have to go back to your perfect quality edit masters and make a whole new MP3.
Since you got far enough down the path, can we assume your book is for sale on Amazon and it’s not a cookbook?
Is this your first book?
Koz