- is a significant disbenefit.
Didn’t we previously use the Nyquist DTMF Generator then made a built-in effect?

several reasons why the Nyquist version would be preferable:
- MUCH faster generating low frequency alias free tones.
- Can have a preview button.
- Can easily be extended for additional waveforms.
- Very easily maintained.
- Adjustable starting phase.
- Supports very low frequencies (< 1 Hz).
- Supports frequencies up to (and including) the Nyquist frequency.
So are those apart from 3) and 4) bugs or limitations in the built-in generator? What does 7) mean? Tone Generator doesn’t generate a 22050 Hz Sine tone at 44100 Hz sample rate.
We could fix those problems, e.g. allow Preview in built-in Generate effects?
There is no huge demand for new tones - most of the requests want Triangle added. I see no harm in shipping an advanced Tone Generator as well as the built-in one, if the Nyquist one has sufficient features. The custom oscillation looks interesting. I can’t see the need for the amplitude scale control. The “Square, no alias” could be removed from the built-in generator if we had a Nyquist generator too.
Any other cool features you could add that would (possibly) justify a separate Nyquist Generator? Some sort of control for extra/reduced overtones?
One guy recently requested generating antimatter tones: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tEZqTnlFe3Y. Should that be an effect, rather than part of the generation?
Gale