Which one in your view is better for noise reduction?
Neither one if I understand you're meaning. The purpose of both is to prevent large, slow movements of air typical of P popping or wind noise. They are both intended to be acoustically transparent while they're doing it.
The tennis racket does it through the limited ability to stretch. There's a second type which is a solid screen.
That one works by the inability to pass wind through its little holes. Neither is good for field work where wind can come from any direction. There, the foam ball or other covering reins.
The foam ball can
indirectly affect motor noise. It will allow you to get closer to the microphone without distortion. You got louder but the motor didn't. It's not filtering out the motor.
You can use the microphone to help you find the noise. Take it from its mount, remove the foam and start a recording. Turn it so it faces different parts of the room, announce as you go.
"This is pointed to the fridge."
The USB cable is going to restrict your ability to move around. I did it with a conventional microphone and a long cable. A piece of my musical keyboard across the room was making hummmmm noise.
You can also do it in real time by listening to the system while you go. That can be really fast because you don't have to stop and play the recording.
Not having good soundproofing can cause problems.
"This is the fridge noise bouncing from the hard walls."
Koz