Given that we generally recommend recording with a peak level of around -6 dB (for 16-bit recording), the recording level sounds as if it is not far off "ideal".gd0 wrote:I trashed my test files, so no precise measurement. There was a visible signal, which looks like it would take about 9dB of amplification to get "right."
The dynamic range of 24 bit audio greatly exceeds the "usable" dynamic range of either the analog components in your system or the room in which you are listening (assuming that you don't live in an underground bunker). The major benefit of 24 bit recording is that this massive amount of dynamic range means that it is not necessary to push the levels up to the limit. It does not surprise me that a 24-bit recording has a few dB of headroom.
Probably not. Amplifying digitally will be both more accurate and less noisy than adding more analog components to the chain. Assuming that you use the default 32-bit float format in Audacity (recommended), digital amplification will be accurate to approximately 0.0000000000001 % (much better than the best analog equipment).gd0 wrote:It's starting to look like the simplest solution will be to add the analog pre-amp into the chain.