Help for Audacity on Windows.
Forum rules
This forum is for Audacity on Windows.
Please state which version of Windows you are using,
and the exact three-section version number of Audacity from "Help menu > About Audacity".
Audacity 1.2.x and 1.3.x are obsolete and no longer supported. If you still have those versions, please upgrade at
https://www.audacityteam.org/download/.
The old forums for those versions are now closed, but you can still read the archives of the
1.2.x and
1.3.x forums.
-
Trebor
- Posts: 9847
- Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2008 5:22 pm
- Operating System: Windows 8 or 8.1
Post
by Trebor » Tue May 26, 2015 6:04 am
rovingcowboy wrote:... I've not heard of any more back masking but they might have been doing it with underground studios.
What some claim is intentional-backmasking is unintentional via
pareidolia.
wikipedia.org/wiki/Backmasking#Court_cases wrote:Judas Priest [rock music group] members commented that if they wanted to insert subliminal commands in their music, messages leading to the deaths of their fans would be counterproductive, and they would prefer to insert the command "Buy more of our records."
-
rovingcowboy
- Posts: 72
- Joined: Thu May 21, 2015 8:32 pm
- Operating System: Please select
Post
by rovingcowboy » Tue May 26, 2015 9:27 am
Trebor wrote:"wikipedia.org/wiki/Backmasking#Court_cases"]Judas Priest [rock music group] members commented that if they wanted to insert subliminal commands in their music, messages leading to the deaths of their fans would be counterproductive, and they would prefer to insert the command "Buy more of our records.
Haha hahaha yep that makes more sense then what they were said to have done.
-
pohon
- Posts: 14
- Joined: Mon May 25, 2015 1:56 am
- Operating System: Please select
Post
by pohon » Tue May 26, 2015 3:40 pm
I find a decoding method by twisting high freq and low freq with other editor on this link: http://www.subliminalrich.com/english/all/16-how-to-subliminal/39-decoding-a-subliminal-audio-to-check-the-sentences.html
Can we do the same with Audacity?
-
steve
- Site Admin
- Posts: 80677
- Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2007 11:43 am
- Operating System: Linux *buntu
Post
by steve » Tue May 26, 2015 4:53 pm
There are many techniques used for embedding subliminal messages in audio files. In order to "decode" the message you need to know what method has been used to encode it. "Amplitude modulation" is one such technique and there is information about decoding that type of "silent subliminal" in this topic:
http://forum.audacityteam.org/viewtopic ... 86#p148686
Also probably worth mentioning that there is little scientific evidence that subliminal messages "work", and no credible scientific evidence supporting "AM", "FM" or "frequency shift" methods of encoding subliminal messages.
-
kozikowski
- Forum Staff
- Posts: 68902
- Joined: Thu Aug 02, 2007 5:57 pm
- Operating System: macOS 10.13 High Sierra
Post
by kozikowski » Tue May 26, 2015 5:30 pm
And then there's the variation between the versions you are expected to derive intelligence by decoding, and the one that supposed to help you give up smoking while you listen. Again, if you don't know what you have, you may never know what's there.
Koz
-
pohon
- Posts: 14
- Joined: Mon May 25, 2015 1:56 am
- Operating System: Please select
Post
by pohon » Wed May 27, 2015 2:12 am
Kozikowski and steve opinion of the impossibility of my case sound reasonable. But I still have a bit hope since rovingcowboy idea of frequencies hacking on eq seems make it somehow near to possible.
I think I prefer someone who expert to do this for me. So if any of you guys on this forum can help me for this decoding thing, please drop an email to gokspay {at} gmail com. I will bought you a doughnut and a cup of coffee for this
Thank you for all of your thought kozikowski, rovingcowboy, steve. I want to stop here. So if mods gonna close this thread please to do so. Thank you
