Help for Audacity on macOS.
Forum rules
This forum is for Audacity on macOS 10.4 and later.
Please state which version of macOS you are using,
and the exact three-section version number of Audacity from "Audacity menu > About Audacity".
Audacity 1.2.x and 1.3.x are obsolete and no longer supported. If you still have those versions, please upgrade at
https://www.audacityteam.org/download/.
The old forums for those versions are now closed, but you can still read the archives of the
1.2.x and
1.3.x forums.
-
Gale Andrews
- Quality Assurance
- Posts: 41761
- Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 12:02 am
- Operating System: Windows 10
Post
by Gale Andrews » Sat May 16, 2015 8:01 am
steve wrote:Gale Andrews wrote:Hang on. The very page you point to makes clear that the default (tied to the RMS choice) is downwards compression. Of course make-up to 0 dB is on by default.
Yes, makeup gain is on by default, so the net effect is that it compresses "upward".
As I wrote in an earlier post, upward compression is the "exact equivalent to compressing downward and then amplifying", which is exactly what Audacity is doing with the default settings.
I think many would expect that the peak/RMS choice is not tied to compression direction, but are you arguing that make-up gain should be off by default? The problem would then be that naive users would say "Help, my waveform has vanished".
Gale
-
steve
- Site Admin
- Posts: 80677
- Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2007 11:43 am
- Operating System: Linux *buntu
Post
by steve » Sat May 16, 2015 3:50 pm
Gale Andrews wrote:The problem would then be that naive users would say "Help, my waveform has vanished".
The waveform is hardly likely to "vanish" unless they also push the Threshold down to an extremely low level, but why does the threshold go so low anyway?
-
whateverman
- Posts: 14
- Joined: Fri May 01, 2015 11:54 am
- Operating System: Please select
Post
by whateverman » Thu Jul 30, 2015 9:51 am
Why also aren't their smaller ratios than 1.5 to 1? That's a real blunt tool.
-
steve
- Site Admin
- Posts: 80677
- Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2007 11:43 am
- Operating System: Linux *buntu
Post
by steve » Thu Jul 30, 2015 1:25 pm
whateverman wrote:Why also aren't their smaller ratios than 1.5 to 1? That's a real blunt tool.
1.5 to 1 is a very small amount of compression, especially if you set the Threshold quite high. With a compression ratio of 1.5:1 and a high threshold, the effect will be so subtle that you can't hear the difference.
-
whateverman
- Posts: 14
- Joined: Fri May 01, 2015 11:54 am
- Operating System: Please select
Post
by whateverman » Thu Jul 30, 2015 8:55 pm
I'm gonna go with user error then, because I was working with an orchestral track with very wide dynamic range and I could not for the life of me get the built-in Compressor tool to avoid being over-aggressive at raising volume on the quiet parts. I didn't try very hard though, just ended up using
Chris Capel's 1.2.6 plugin instead.
(I'm crossposting I know, but I really think it's relevant to both thread. Sorry mods.)
-
steve
- Site Admin
- Posts: 80677
- Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2007 11:43 am
- Operating System: Linux *buntu
Post
by steve » Thu Jul 30, 2015 11:27 pm
whateverman wrote:I'm gonna go with user error then, because...
A good tip for using any dynamic range effect (compressors, limiters, et al), amplify (or normalize) up to 0 dB before you use the effect. Why? Because it makes it much easier to see and hear what the effect is doing. For example, if you normalize to 0 dB and then use the compressor with the "Threshold" set to -3 dB, then it is that top 3 dB that is compressed.
Having said that, I do agree to the extent that I think that the range of the compression ratio should start at 1:1.
