As I understand it - I am not a lawyer- a karaoke version of the original song with the vocals removed would be a remix. For a remix, you need permission from the copyright owner and song publisher and a mechanical licence on which you pay fees:jamil09 wrote:So I have no choice but to remove my track?I thought I can just tell that it was originally by the artist and I dont intend to steal it. Awww
http://suebasko.blogspot.co.uk/2010/12/ ... gally.html .
According to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Remix#Copy ... plications:
A karaoke version is probably not transformative.if the work that is distributed by the remixer is an entirely new and transformative work that is not for profit, copyright laws are not breached. The key word in such considerations is transformative, as the remix product must have been either sufficiently altered or clearly used for a sufficiently different purpose for it to be safe from copyright violation.
When you record a cover version, you don't need permission, but you must pay fees:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cover_ver ... yright_law
http://suebasko.blogspot.co.uk/2010/12/ ... ng_19.html .
However if you are adding your own vocals after removing vocals from the original song, that is not in my understanding usually regarded as recording a cover. It is usually regarded as a remix, so permission is required as above.
Gale