Yes, that's a pity, I've noticed that too. Although, my X-Fi stream audio seems to be special in that it is rather Audigy based and has an older chip set than the other X-Fis. However, I don't fiddle around with my drivers lest I am out of sound...Gale Andrews wrote:Yes thanks to Shaky too from me.I made a note of that site , and it's noteworthy that they were supplying updated drivers for certain legacy Creative products up to 2009 (much longer than Creative were).
However not all Creative products were covered - for example X-Fi.
Gale
Crash of 2.0.3 upon launch in Win XP
Forum rules
This forum is for Audacity on Windows.
Please state which version of Windows you are using,
and the exact three-section version number of Audacity from "Help menu > About Audacity".
Audacity 1.2.x and 1.3.x are obsolete and no longer supported. If you still have those versions, please upgrade at https://www.audacityteam.org/download/.
The old forums for those versions are now closed, but you can still read the archives of the 1.2.x and 1.3.x forums.
Please state which version of Windows you are using,
and the exact three-section version number of Audacity from "Help menu > About Audacity".
Audacity 1.2.x and 1.3.x are obsolete and no longer supported. If you still have those versions, please upgrade at https://www.audacityteam.org/download/.
The old forums for those versions are now closed, but you can still read the archives of the 1.2.x and 1.3.x forums.
-
Robert J. H.
- Posts: 3633
- Joined: Thu May 31, 2012 8:33 am
- Operating System: Windows 10
Re: Crash of 2.0.3 upon launch in Win XP
Re: Crash of 2.0.3 upon launch in Win XP
Pleased to be of help.tucboy85 wrote:Thanks to Shaky for the lead on the kX project!
I recall maybe sometime 2007/8 trying to reinstall an XP machine with my old soundblaster card; constant blue screen of death seemingly no matter what Creative driver pack I installed. A disgraceful level of support.
And frankly surprising since when I listen to recordings I made when the card was in my main PC I am always struck by how good it sounds. I now use an Asus Xonar D2 soundcard that on paper has far superior specifications but I subjectively prefer my Soundblaster recordings, and I wonder whether theoretically lower sound quality imparts a quality analogous to the saturation effects known from certain analogue equipment like EQs?? That is almost certainly superstitious nonsense, however.
-
kozikowski
- Forum Staff
- Posts: 68902
- Joined: Thu Aug 02, 2007 5:57 pm
- Operating System: macOS 10.13 High Sierra
Re: Crash of 2.0.3 upon launch in Win XP
Or linear tape -- or Rupert-Neve sound consoles.certain analogue equipment like EQs
It may not be just you. Super wide-band audio channels also make distortion more apparent. Distortion products always go up (harmonic distortion) and full 20KHz bandwidth audio channels can carry a lot of distortion.
I went to a demonstration of sound quality and was treated to different problems that sound systems can have. The operator played a most pleasant sound track and then told us it was recorded by very good quality older equipment none of which was capable of anything over 15 KHz.
Koz