2 Remote Podcast Recordings, 2 different final length

Hello,

My friend and I are doing a podcast together but live 2 1/2 hours away.

We use Audacity to record independently and sync both our start and stop time.

We both export as MP3 and have also tried as WAV, but my file is always shorter and his is always longer. All of the content is there for both but his is spaced and/or mine is compressed. We tried screen sharing to make sure all of the settings were the same and seem to be. I am unsure if this is related to bits per second or what, but somehow the final lengths and timing are far off. Makes for an editing nightmare.

Can anyone please help how we can ensure our synced recordings end up the exact same time???

THANK YOU!

sync both our start and stop time.

That means you both “One, Two, Three, Clap!!” Another way to do that is one of you claps and the other holds the headphones up to their microphone.

Figure out how much longer one is than the other and use Audacity > Effect > Change Speed on one of them. That’s it. If you derive a percentage, the two shows will always fail sync by the same percentage no matter how long they are.

This is a cheap computer problem. The movie people spent very serious money to make sure all the recorders on a shoot run at exactly the same speed.

You should both be in 44100 sampling rate. Under certain conditions, Audacity can’t cope with different rates on two timelines.

If you get the two ends to perfectly match but it’s off in the middle, then one or both of the computers is broken and I think I hear my mum calling…

Koz

Thank you so very much for the reply!

Yes, we do the one, two, three clap… but have not tried to determine the % rate of difference, will do this - thank you!

I have background in film years ago so never had to deal with this issue before.

Yes, we are both at the 44.1k sample rate.

We will determine the difference percentage then go into Effect and Change Speed.

THANK YOU SO SO SO VERY MUCH!

Cheers!

Just to be clear, chances are good you’re not both running at 44100.00. One of you may be running at 44100.01, for example. You’re experiencing that tiny difference in sampling rates. In film terms, one of your cameras is slightly under or over-cranked.

Effect > Change Speed is the least damaging of the corrections and you should be able to resolve everything OK.

The other two are Effect > Change Tempo and Effect Change Pitch. Those two have to rip the sound apart and try to put it back together with the corrections burned in. Those are much more likely to create sound damage.

Try that trick of putting the headphones up against the microphone. You can get the sync clap with no human reaction time.

Koz

Koz,

You’re brilliant, thank you so very much for the care and support!

Will troubleshoot this over the next week when reconnecting with my buddy and will report back.

THANK YOU SO VERY MUCH!

Cheers!

Post back with your experiences. That’s how we build a log of what works and what doesn’t.

Koz

Certainly will do, thank you!!!

Please allow one weeks time.

I would think that Effect > Change Speed is the most correct method to use. After all, if a recording is played back at a different rate than it was recorded at (such as recording at 44100.01 and playing back at 44100.00), then both its length and its pitch will change by the same amount but in opposite directions. Effect > Change Speed will naturally correct both.

(I can’t help but think of those old Walkman cassette players with weak batteries. Everything got slower and lower pitched! Effect > Change Speed can fix that too, unless the batteries get progressively weaker to the point where the playback rate approaches 0 Hz, then fixing that becomes more challenging.)

I agree :wink:

Hello Koz, Christop, & Steve,

I was able to open to separate Audacity Files - one mine and one my friend’s single track recordings from our podcast.

For this specific podcast night from weeks prior we did not start and end with claps (as we usually do) so it was a bit more difficult to get the perfect ratio… However, I did get it close enough to pass as clean transitions from beginning to end.

My track was 1 hour 54 minutes and 48 seconds
My friends track was 2 hours 4 minutes 59 seconds

If you listen to the uncompressed (without Speed Change) tracks, they are in sync and as time goes on they begin to drift further and further out of sync. This made for an editing nightmare taking 6+ hours when should have been a 3 hour or less job.

As stated above, we did not clap to start of end this specific podcast from weeks ago, but was able to attempt to time per beginning and opening conversation within fractions of a second - not the best or greatest accuracy but was able to make it work. The loosely accurate % rate from this attempt was 8.867% change.

I look forward to making a new recording and/or reviewing some of our other recordings where we did clap in and clap out.

IN SHORT, THE EFFECT > CHANGE SPEED certainly works and seems to be no distortion or quality loss.

Thank you Koz, will repost again next weekend after we make a fresh recording and use this method more accurately.

THANK YOU!

With that high of a speed change, it sounds like one of the recordings (the longer one) was actually taken at 48000 Hz instead of 44100. Speeding that up to match 44100 would be about an 8.844% change.

With speed changes that big, you do start to wonder if there’s something else wrong. I expect an actual computer recording error to come in well below 1%.

Effect > Change Speed is still a valid way to correct the error, but then you call whoever is recording the odd one and fix it so they all match for the next show.

48000 is the sampling rate for sound on video. 44100 is the sampling rate for Audio CD. Both valid, but they should match.

Media Info on-line should tell you what you have.

https://mediaarea.net/MediaInfoOnline

Koz

Thank you both for the reply.

We did numerous screen share sessions trying to figure this out before and I am confident that both Audacities (mine and his) were recording at 44,100 and that all other visible settings were identical. We spent a lot of time trouble shooting this previously before I thought to get tech support from Audacity and found this forum with wonderful people who help - thank you!

Other than that I can not really say much more other than those are the #'s.

We should be on for this coming weekend and do the clap test and will be able to dial this in further.

Thank you and all the best!

What happened with the MediaInfo tools? We absolutely expect your two sound performances to not match. You can do those locally without shipping sound files around.

Make a short recording, “Testing one two three.” Stop. File > Export WAV (Microsoft) 16bit. Run Media Info in your browser.

MediaInfoReport.jpg
What does it say in the lower left of your Audacity window?

Screen Shot 2020-02-11 at 3.53.06.png
Audacity > Edit > Preferences > Quality.

Screen Shot 2020-02-11 at 3.54.51.png
Koz

We are particularly interested in you resolving this because you are using the recommended process for producing a multi-point podcast with no transmission, delay, and internet collision sound damage.

There are a handful of errors that only appear when you compare your work to somebody else’s. It would be grand to know what happened to you.

This is a four-way musical performance which looks like a live, quad-split Skype, but is actually three of them shipping independent video files to Josh (in the lower left). This is the video version of what you’re doing.

Screen Shot 2020-02-11 at 4.07.33.png
Koz

Okay so I guess all we confirmed was the project rate in the lower left hand corner and looked around at all of the other settings.

We DID NOT do the WAV export @ 16 bit and run media info in our browser.

How would I do the later part?

I know how to export into a wave file, and can locate that file on my desktop for convenience… but how would I “Run info in my browser”?

Do I right click the file, go under properties, and then details?

How do I do what you showed in your screen shot? “Run info in my browser”?

THANK YOU!

P.S. Will also go under Edit, Preferences, and Quality to compare both systems but I think we did this previously. Will double check.

Audacity does not have an INFO service. It’s a feature request. If you ask Audacity for information about the sound file it just opened up, it will give you a blank look and shrug its shoulders. It’s up to other software to figure it out.

Right click on a Mac > Get Info and it will give you a whole page of everything you ever wanted to know about that file.

This WAV file was created on a Thursday, January 2nd, 2020 at 2:30PM (1430). It was an unusually balmy afternoon with temperatures in the 60s (15C) and moderate humidity. There was a promise of rain later.


Put a file to be inspected on your desktop. Run your browser. Type or paste this in. This is FireFox.

Screen Shot 2020-02-11 at 16.13.43.png
Or just click this link.

https://mediaarea.net/MediaInfoOnline

It will open with an invitation to select a file to be analyzed. Point it to your mystery file on the desktop.

Screen Shot 2020-02-11 at 16.08.56.png
Let us know if you get stuck. We just go full tilt until somebody stops us.

Koz

44100 and 48000 aren’t the only two. Those are just the two most likely to be used in normal day-to-day home operation. Higher numbers are used in studios and lower numbers are used in utility jobs such as music on-hold and Voice Response.

“Your call is important to us…”

Koz

You know what’s going to happen, right? The two files are going to be statistically perfect in every way…except one is longer than the other.

Koz

Haha, Koz - thanks for all of the help and support!

I know it is a big no-no in media world but the Audacity Recordings are both being done on PC. I use the Mac for editing.

Would you happen to know how to get that data info you referred to on a PC after the WAV export?

With a PC we can right click and say “Properties” then jump to the “Details” tab.

Is this what you mean? I have two screen shots to share.

Thanks!
1.JPG
2.JPG