The current "make-up gain" is actually a "normalize" function. It amplifies the output to a peak level of 0 dB.cpsmusic wrote:One thing that would be useful to me would be an adjustable make-up gain control.
Shorter minimum attack and release times for Compressor
Re: Shorter minimum attack and release times for Compressor
9/10 questions are answered in the FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS (FAQ)
-
Gale Andrews
- Quality Assurance
- Posts: 41761
- Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 12:02 am
- Operating System: Windows 10
Re: Shorter minimum attack and release times for Compressor
This is getting off the subject, perhaps you should split to a new topic.steve wrote:The current "make-up gain" is actually a "normalize" function. It amplifies the output to a peak level of 0 dB.cpsmusic wrote:One thing that would be useful to me would be an adjustable make-up gain control.
I think it is better to describe "Make-up gain" as an "Amplify" function (in Audacity terminology). It only makes the loudest track peak at 0 dB, any other tracks are scaled up by the same dB increase that the loudest track had.
Gale
________________________________________FOR INSTANT HELP: (Click on Link below)
* * * * * Tips * * * * * Tutorials * * * * * Quick Start Guide * * * * * Audacity Manual
* * * * * Tips * * * * * Tutorials * * * * * Quick Start Guide * * * * * Audacity Manual
Re: Shorter minimum attack and release times for Compressor
If we want to restrict the topic to the one feature stated in the topic, then I think we all agree.Gale Andrews wrote:This is getting off the subject
I'll be quite happy to make the change this evening if there are no objections.
Within the current effect:
I'm +1 for Attack Time to go down to 0.01 seconds, but -1 for going less than that.
I'm +1 for Release Time to go down to 0.1 seconds, but -1 for going less than that.
9/10 questions are answered in the FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS (FAQ)
-
billw58
- Forum Staff
- Posts: 5601
- Joined: Wed Aug 12, 2009 2:10 am
- Operating System: macOS 10.15 Catalina or later
Re: Shorter minimum attack and release times for Compressor
Go for it.steve wrote:If we want to restrict the topic to the one feature stated in the topic, then I think we all agree.Gale Andrews wrote:This is getting off the subject
I'll be quite happy to make the change this evening if there are no objections.
-- Bill
-
waxcylinder
- Forum Staff
- Posts: 14684
- Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2007 11:03 am
- Operating System: Windows 10
Re: Shorter minimum attack and release times for Compressor
Do-ocray ... 
________________________________________FOR INSTANT HELP: (Click on Link below)
* * * * * FAQ * * * * * Tutorials * * * * * Audacity Manual * * * * *
* * * * * FAQ * * * * * Tutorials * * * * * Audacity Manual * * * * *
Re: Shorter minimum attack and release times for Compressor
That's a minimum attack of of 10 ms. Other compressors allow a minimum attack below 1 ms ...steve wrote:Within the current effect:
I'm +1 for Attack Time to go down to 0.01 seconds, but -1 for going less than that.
The default attack setting could still be something middling , but give people the option of sub 1ms if it is possible.
Re: Shorter minimum attack and release times for Compressor
Perhaps they do, but do they go up to 5 seconds attack and 30 seconds release?Trebor wrote:Other compressors allow a minimum attack below 1 ms ...
At the minimum settings, those GMulti compressor setting will not behave like a "dynamic compressor" in the Audacity Compressor - it's too fast for low frequencies. it'll be "wave-shaping" rather than "compressing the dynamics". (Not that there is anything wrong with that as "an effect".)
9/10 questions are answered in the FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS (FAQ)
Re: Shorter minimum attack and release times for Compressor
I've not noticed any wave-shaping distortion using the Gmulti compressor with sub 1ms attack ,steve wrote:Perhaps they do, but do they go up to 5 seconds attack and 30 seconds release?Trebor wrote:Other compressors allow a minimum attack below 1 ms ...
At the minimum settings, those GMulti compressor setting will not behave like a "dynamic compressor" in the Audacity Compressor - it's too fast for low frequencies. it'll be "wave-shaping" rather than "compressing the dynamics". (Not that there is anything wrong with that as "an effect".)
maybe Gmulti is applying sustained-compression between the attack-threshold being reached and release, ( and not telling me about it ).
Re: Shorter minimum attack and release times for Compressor
Yes, perhaps, but Gale was trying to get us to stay on topic so that we could get an actual resultTrebor wrote:maybe Gmulti is applying sustained-compression between the attack-threshold being reached and release, ( and not telling me about it ).
It may not be quite as much as you want, and I'd certainly want other improvements eventually, but do you support a tenfold reduction to the minimum attack/release times? (that's what's on the table now).
9/10 questions are answered in the FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS (FAQ)
-
Gale Andrews
- Quality Assurance
- Posts: 41761
- Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 12:02 am
- Operating System: Windows 10
Re: Shorter minimum attack and release times for Compressor
Seems reasonable. I've wondered myself why the minimum was set so high.steve wrote:Within the current effect:
I'm +1 for Attack Time to go down to 0.01 seconds, but -1 for going less than that.
I'm +1 for Release Time to go down to 0.1 seconds, but -1 for going less than that.
Will that make the slider harder to use at the current range? One change we perhaps could make quite easily to Compressor would be to add text input boxes.
Gale
________________________________________FOR INSTANT HELP: (Click on Link below)
* * * * * Tips * * * * * Tutorials * * * * * Quick Start Guide * * * * * Audacity Manual
* * * * * Tips * * * * * Tutorials * * * * * Quick Start Guide * * * * * Audacity Manual