Thanks for your advice and help!
We haven't been much of either so far.
I found the sound test I did with the two-computer setup. I'm in Los Angeles and Denise is somewhere in New Jersey. Four time zones. Her voice sounds slightly funny because all she did was open her tiny laptop, accept the connection and started talking. Her microphone is going through a little voice processing.
She's also wearing headphones—
required.
http://kozco.com/tech/audacity/clips/De ... lyCut3.mp3
Two notes: This is a non-rehearsed first-time-out test. I included the music to illustrate what you can do when your music playback, the Audacity record and the Skype connection are all separate and don't interfere with each other.
It's not unusual to do it this way. That's what's happening here on the Pando Podcast.
There may be others.
Nobody's shocked that you can record your own voice. That's a service of your own computer. The
far side is a service of Skype and they do not like to share.
Nobody is likely to pop up and tell you a foolproof method of self-recording both sides. As above, that's only going to work until Skype decides to change something.
It's not hopeless, however. You can do a Skype podcast without going through Skype. Each performer records their own voice, saves a high quality WAV of the performance and then posts it to you to jam together into a single show.
That's what this is.
This was a little heavy and crazy because it was a broadcast radio production, but I recorded the Los Angeles portion in that conference room and shipped my sound file to somewhere in another state to integrate with the interviewer—who was recording their own voice.
As you noted, it's not hard to record your own voice, so have each performer do that.
I understand if you're doing free-form interviews, different each week, that's not going to work. But then you're not doing a "simple" podcast any more, either.
Koz