Re: question about change timescale change to 432hz
Posted: Sun Dec 27, 2015 11:00 am
Longer is correct. (1.818% longer)movebetter wrote: they are about 2% longer instead of 2 % shorter
Audacity Forum
For questions, answers and opinions
https://forum.audacityteam.org/
question about change timescale change to 432hz
Page 2 of 2
Re: question about change timescale change to 432hz
Posted: Mon Dec 28, 2015 12:37 am
i am trying to go from 440hz to 432hz and i am using -1.818. this has been working for a few months now but now makes the tracks longer instead of shorter. see attached. thanks,
- 432 convert.png (335.55 KiB) Viewed 850 times
Re: question about change timescale change to 432hz
Posted: Mon Dec 28, 2015 12:43 am
Please see this post: http://forum.audacityteam.org/viewtopic ... 75#p294275movebetter wrote:i am trying to go from 440hz to 432hz and i am using -1.818. this has been working for a few months now but now makes the tracks longer instead of shorter. see attached. thanks,
Re: question about change timescale change to 432hz
Posted: Mon Dec 28, 2015 1:20 am
i dont understand
Re: question about change timescale change to 432hz
Posted: Mon Dec 28, 2015 2:15 am
You have the choice to use Change Speed and accept the track becomes longer, or Change Pitch, which means the track stays more or less the same length.
Gale
Gale
Re: question about change timescale change to 432hz
Posted: Mon Dec 28, 2015 6:49 pm
ok, i see, supposed to be longer. sorry and thank you..