Fixing an ACX Issue

Help for Audacity 2.x.x on Windows.
Forum rules
ImageThis forum is for Audacity 2.x.x on Windows.
Please state which version of Windows you are using,
and the exact three-section version number of Audacity from "Help menu > About Audacity".


Audacity 1.2.x and 1.3.x are obsolete and no longer supported. If you still have those versions, please upgrade at https://www.audacityteam.org/download/.
The old forums for those versions are now closed, but you can still read the archives of the 1.2.x and 1.3.x forums.
TJB
Posts: 127
Joined: Sat Mar 21, 2020 3:03 pm
Operating System: Windows 10

Re: Fixing an ACX Issue

Post by TJB » Tue Dec 22, 2020 3:28 pm

Aaaarrrgggghhh ... still don't know if they've accepted my fix to Chapters 3 and 7, but yesterday they bounced Chapter 1 for the same reason.

That's a little confusing to me as wouldn't they have detected an issue in Ch 1 BEFORE they noticed something in Chapters 3 and 7 ?

Further, I ran Chapter 1 though the Audio Lab and the Audio Analysis sections and the chapter passed with no issues .... so I'm wondering if the QA is something over and above the Audio Lab analysis ....................... and if so, isn't the feedback from the Audio Lab and Audio Analysis tabs kind of meaningless?

Color me frustrated ....... I'm reluctant to waste my time trying to fix Ch 1 if I don't know whether my fixes worked in Chapters 3 and 7 .... I don't need to repeat my mistakes

FYI, I just sent ACX this same question. The first four books i did, all went thru QA without a hiccup .... now book 5 is driving me nuts/ They say expect a response in 1-2 days

kozikowski
Forum Staff
Posts: 68014
Joined: Thu Aug 02, 2007 5:57 pm
Operating System: macOS 10.13 High Sierra

Re: Fixing an ACX Issue

Post by kozikowski » Tue Dec 22, 2020 6:15 pm

I just sent ACX this same question.
There is nearly zero chance ACX will reply. They're not in the business of troubleshooting your studio.
wouldn't they have detected an issue in Ch 1 BEFORE they noticed something in Chapters 3 and 7 ?
I can't prove this, but I suspect they have "Reputation Ratings." My rating, for example, would be: "This guy has the technical performance down cold, but he can't read. Pay attention to his tongue ticks and mouth noises."

Yours might be: "This reader has submitted noise problems in the past. Pay attention to chapter background noise, odd damage, and make sure all the chapters match."

Nobody said ACX was going to reject you for low noise. Super low noise signals to ACX that something was done to the performance that may cause distortion or damage. Their radar goes up. Nobody can record directly into -90dB noise without shenanigans.

Worse, now you have a reputation for trying to glue and patch a broken performance back together.

Post the ACX reply. Exactly.

Koz

TJB
Posts: 127
Joined: Sat Mar 21, 2020 3:03 pm
Operating System: Windows 10

Re: Fixing an ACX Issue

Post by TJB » Wed Dec 23, 2020 4:23 pm

Koz, I had a reply from ACX telling me to reply directly to the rejection email in order to reach the Engineer who reviewed the chapter(s) in question and so, this morning, I sent the below note:

"Color me frustrated. I did four books, all of which went thru QA with nary a hiccup. The fifth book, however, has now bounced 3 times, all for the same reason albeit in different chapters. Initially, Chapter 3 bounced, I fixed it (I think) and returned it. A couple of weeks later, Chapter 7 bounced ... again I think I fixed it and returned it. Then yesterday Chapter 1 bounced for the same reasons. In all three cases, it claims noise somewhere at the beginning and/or end of the chapter.

I've run all the chapters through the Audio Lab and all pass with no issues found. The same with Audio Analysis tool ... no issues found.

I'm confused because I would've thought that if there were an issue in Chapter 1, I would have been notified BEFORE Chapters 3 and 7.

Further, since I THINK I fixed Chapters 3 and 7, it would be beneficial to know if that's correct ...... particularly before I use the same method to correct Chapter 1, only to find out that the methodology for making the correction didn't work.

I could use and will appreciate any help you can give me on this. The ACX book title is TRUTH, LIES AND TROLLS "

Soooooo, now I'll send you a copy of whatever comes of this request to ACX ...
Tom

kozikowski
Forum Staff
Posts: 68014
Joined: Thu Aug 02, 2007 5:57 pm
Operating System: macOS 10.13 High Sierra

Re: Fixing an ACX Issue

Post by kozikowski » Wed Dec 23, 2020 5:43 pm

Thank you, but I'm interested in reading their last rejection.

They don't publish their detailed analysis process and the only way we know what they're thinking outside of their publications is detailed parsing of their rejections.
I did four books, all of which went thru QA with nary a hiccup.
It's possible you may get special treatment because of that. Your reputation until then has been short path to publication. It was a nasty surprise when the fifth reading failed simple testing and even worse when they started looking more closely and discovered other problems.

They usually do one layer of analysis. In my case drink apple juice and practice not smacking your tongue so much. But when I tried to get further dialog the connection closed. That was before The Sickness. If you didn't get a good detail in the rejection, then I suspect they stopped giving it unless you ask for it.

They greatly pared back their services. I think I mentioned they no longer offer short chapter human review. Your choices are submit a book or don't.

Koz

TJB
Posts: 127
Joined: Sat Mar 21, 2020 3:03 pm
Operating System: Windows 10

Re: Fixing an ACX Issue

Post by TJB » Thu Dec 24, 2020 6:27 pm

Koz ... room tone. I think you said earlier to find some room tone on a previous section that had passed ACX QC and then cut and paste that in any new recording. Did I understand that right?

Here's what I\ve been doing previously ... when I open Audacity, I'd make sure furnace, etc, is off ... then I'd hold my breath and hit 'record' for about 5 secs. I'd do that each and every time I began a new recording. So my question is, I guess: Can I cut and paste a previously good 5-10 seconds of 'room tone' and use that on each and every recording by pasting it in?

Sorry I'm so dense but I confused on noisefloor and room tone ... are they not the same thing?

*********
The other question is: Once I begin the mastering, and I go through all the steps (filter curve, RMS Normalize, and Limiter) and do an ACX check and, let's say, I get a -65db reading. Is that enuf ... or should I do a Noise Reduction anyway? In other words, is the Noise Reduction a step we should always use?
**********
No reply from ACX yet as to the base question ........................... Merry Christmas, Koz ... thanx for your help

kozikowski
Forum Staff
Posts: 68014
Joined: Thu Aug 02, 2007 5:57 pm
Operating System: macOS 10.13 High Sierra

Re: Fixing an ACX Issue

Post by kozikowski » Thu Dec 24, 2020 8:12 pm

are they not the same thing?
"Room Tone" is the noise the room is making if you're not making any sound. That's the traffic outside, refrigerator, etc. All the stuff before the microphone. This stuff can be a little magic. I have a bass cabinet that doesn't go off when I turn it off and it injects a very low volume [mmmmmmmm] into everything I do. That took a while to find. I was up to Space Ship Conspiracy Theories. I have power lines over the house. I wonder if when they get wet...........

Noise Floor is all the noises that the microphone and microphone system are making. Microphones make noise, some more than others. Your job is to be way louder than the microphone noise without overloading anything. You can measure that in Audacity. Audacity has a natural noise floor of -96dB. Guaranteed that almost everything you do is louder than that.

Background noise is a generic term from the point of view of the performance. What does it sound like between sentences when you stop talking and breathing.
let's say, I get a -65db reading.
I would say that was absolutely normal for a home reader. This is where Obsessive Koz kicks in and wants to apply Noise Reduction of the beast. 6, 6, 6. We have determine that a gentle reduction like that produces a well-behaved, quiet background noise for your reading and perhaps most importantly, ACX can't tell what you did.

That gives you a submitted performance noise of -71dB. Perfect.

I need to drop for a while.

Koz

kozikowski
Forum Staff
Posts: 68014
Joined: Thu Aug 02, 2007 5:57 pm
Operating System: macOS 10.13 High Sierra

Re: Fixing an ACX Issue

Post by kozikowski » Thu Dec 24, 2020 8:58 pm

That's -65dB after mastering, right? You may find that the mastering tools can help your noise way more than you think. Many home microphones naturally produce a low-pitched rumble sound that can mess up noise readings. Low Rolloff sucks that rumble right out of your performance. It's one of the reasons you must apply the three mastering tools in order.

This is where actual audio editing comes into the picture. Most of the time you should try to suppress mouth noises, tongue ticks, mistakes etc. You can cover them up with the Room Tone segment you captured along with your live reading.

The process is not Copy and Paste. You can use Punch instead.

viewtopic.php?p=208312#p208312

Punch was designed to be a gift from the angels. Drag-select an error in the performance. Punch. Punch will tailor the replacement sound so it exactly fits the selection covering up the error. Under certain conditions Punch can form a gentle fade on both ends of the correction so to be as unobtrusive as possible.

I've never used it. Let us know how it goes.

Koz

TJB
Posts: 127
Joined: Sat Mar 21, 2020 3:03 pm
Operating System: Windows 10

Re: Fixing an ACX Issue

Post by TJB » Fri Dec 25, 2020 3:47 pm

Koz, I'm searching for the holy grail on Christmas morning. Given our issue with the first sec and trailing 5 secs which, allegedly contain noise (but unseen on the sound track), what about this for a suggested workflow:

First, independently record about 10 secs of quiet 'room noise' ... then save this as a wav file for use later, again and again
Next:
. open a new track and do the recording
. then copy the room noise file (above) and paste in the beginning and end of the recording
. then do the mastering (filter curve, RMS, Limiter, Hum Remover and Noise Reduction
. review the entire track and remove all visible clicks, etc
. then save as a wav file Edit Master and export as an MP3 file

If this is the way to go, then I'm assuming I could always just use the recorded room noise above and paste into any new document.

Does this make any sense or am I off base?
Thanx, Tom

TJB
Posts: 127
Joined: Sat Mar 21, 2020 3:03 pm
Operating System: Windows 10

Re: Fixing an ACX Issue

Post by TJB » Fri Dec 25, 2020 4:21 pm

Also, Koz, earlier you said you wanted to see exactly what the rejection msg said, so here it is:

The ACX Quality Assurance Team has reviewed your recently-completed audiobook, "TRUTH LIES & TROLLS (Bridge Club Book 4) ". We have found 1 issue that must be corrected before we are able to process your audiobook for retail sale.
Below, we have listed the requirements not met and our recommended solutions. When making revisions, always be sure to revise the originally recorded WAV files within your preferred editing software. We recommend revising all files as this helps to instill good editing practices and ensures all errors have been addressed.
• Issue: The production includes files that contain noise at the start and/or tail end. The first 0 to 2 seconds, and the last 1 to 5 seconds of each file must revised to ensure none of them contain any noise, loud breaths and/or mouse clicks at the start before narration begins and at the end after the last spoken word.

Koz, the reason this is so irritating is that what they're saying (contain any noise, loud breaths and/or mouse clicks at the start before narration begins and at the end after the last spoken word) would also seem to imply that these should be visible on the sound track ... whereas on my sound track there are NO visible hiccups. Thus my earlier idea about recording/saving a room tone wav file and then pasting that in on every recording at the start and end prior to mastering.

kozikowski
Forum Staff
Posts: 68014
Joined: Thu Aug 02, 2007 5:57 pm
Operating System: macOS 10.13 High Sierra

Re: Fixing an ACX Issue

Post by kozikowski » Fri Dec 25, 2020 6:06 pm

seem to imply that these should be visible on the sound track
You inferred something they didn't imply.

The normal setup of the timeline blue waves only shows you the loudest 25dB of the show. From -25dB (approximately) to 0dB. That's where most of the production tools work and that's where most of the production decisions need to be made. This has its limitations, as you're finding.

You can force the blue waves to show you everything. Control+Click the vertical bar to the left of the waves > dB.

Screen Shot 2020-12-25 at 9.27.26 AM.png
Screen Shot 2020-12-25 at 9.27.26 AM.png (25.86 KiB) Viewed 223 times

You may find it handy to grab the bottom of the wave display and pull it taller so more of the numbers are visible. You may also find it handy to put it back to Linear since it's really hard to adjust your voice volume in dB.

~~~

Look at the bouncing sound meters. What does the far left side say (you may need to guess as the actual number) -60dB? I use different meters.

You can grab the grab bar on the left of the sound meters and put them anywhere in the menu bar you want. Mine are on the top-left. Grab the right-hand end of the meters and pull them longer, all the way to the right side of the Audacity window.

Audacity > Edit > Preferences > Interface > Meter Range > 96dB.

Screen Shot 2020-12-25 at 10.02.24 AM.png
Screen Shot 2020-12-25 at 10.02.24 AM.png (111.99 KiB) Viewed 223 times

Note with -96dB on the left and the large meters, -70dB, -60dB, -6dB, -3dB, and all the other critical sound measurements are clearly visible.

There's one other change, too. Right-Click the recording meter > Options > Gradient.
Right-Click the playback meter > Options > RMS.

That gives you recording meters which change color when they get close to the critical loud recording and overload points, and two-color playback meters which show you peak and RMS. Remember RMS? ACX's loudness measurement?

I'll understand if your eyes glaze over and you fall down in a faint.

Keep saying to yourself, "I am the recording engineer."

Koz

Post Reply