Can you demonstrate that benefit? I don't see any improvement in noise reduction or time stretching.
Unable to record at 768 kHz on Windows via ASIO
Forum rules
This forum is for Audacity on Windows.
Please state which version of Windows you are using,
and the exact three-section version number of Audacity from "Help menu > About Audacity".
Audacity 1.2.x and 1.3.x are obsolete and no longer supported. If you still have those versions, please upgrade at https://www.audacityteam.org/download/.
The old forums for those versions are now closed, but you can still read the archives of the 1.2.x and 1.3.x forums.
Please state which version of Windows you are using,
and the exact three-section version number of Audacity from "Help menu > About Audacity".
Audacity 1.2.x and 1.3.x are obsolete and no longer supported. If you still have those versions, please upgrade at https://www.audacityteam.org/download/.
The old forums for those versions are now closed, but you can still read the archives of the 1.2.x and 1.3.x forums.
Re: Unable to record at 768 kHz on Windows via ASIO
9/10 questions are answered in the FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS (FAQ)
Re: Unable to record at 768 kHz on Windows via ASIO
Try the following:
- Record at the highest sample rate possible
- Use SoX to resample the recording file with high quality settings, then do the following on two files separately
- Select the same region in both files as your noise profile
- Instead of reducing the noise at first, leave the residue and export
- In a new project, subtract one residue from another by doing phase invert. You should hear the difference in 20-20000 range
As for time stretching, it would take too long to explain, but a practical application of high sample rate recording was done for How To Train Your Dragon franchise. They recorded animal noises and slowed them down significantly (4-10 times). With low sample rate recording (below 88.2) it wouldn't have sounded nice in the finished product
Re: Unable to record at 768 kHz on Windows via ASIO
How do you know that the "difference" isn't due to Noise Reduction working better at the lower sample rate?
The reason why this is probably the case, is that the frequency band of the noise profile are much narrower (more specific) at lower sample rates.
9/10 questions are answered in the FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS (FAQ)
Re: Unable to record at 768 kHz on Windows via ASIO
And here comes my subjectivity, because on lower sample rates, more "good" signal gets chopped off, so it works better for me
Re: Unable to record at 768 kHz on Windows via ASIO
Did you ever get it to work at 768kHz or are you still limited to 384 . thkx