waveform position indicators

Effects, Recipes, Interfacing with other software, etc.
Forum rules
If you require help using Audacity, please post on the forum board relevant to your operating system:
Windows
Mac OS X
GNU/Linux and Unix-like
Post Reply
JasonDS
Posts: 6
Joined: Tue Feb 25, 2014 12:40 am
Operating System: Windows 10

waveform position indicators

Post by JasonDS » Tue Jun 21, 2016 2:44 pm

I would like Audacity to show the waveform position at the start and end of the selected area. (not how loud the sound is but where the wave form is currently in the vertical position, +0.23, -0.47 ext.) This would make it easier to know where to cut and not get a "pop" sound. Also it would help to show where you could loop the audio and not have a "pop" when Audacity or an audio player jumps back to the start of the audio clip.

steve
Site Admin
Posts: 81629
Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2007 11:43 am
Operating System: Linux *buntu

Re: waveform position indicators

Post by steve » Tue Jun 21, 2016 3:40 pm

Audacity is able to snap to zero crossings (if there is a zero crossing near to the ends of the selection). See: http://manual.audacityteam.org/man/edit ... .html#zero
9/10 questions are answered in the FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS (FAQ)

plunderingsloth
Posts: 4
Joined: Fri Sep 16, 2016 3:18 am
Operating System: Windows 10

Re: waveform position indicators

Post by plunderingsloth » Fri Sep 16, 2016 3:35 am

Clicking "Find Zero Crossings" fails to align the cursor along the intersections of the waves and the 0-axis, as demonstrated in the attached picture.
Find Zero Crossings.jpg
Find Zero Crossings.jpg (333.57 KiB) Viewed 1028 times
Therefore, using the tool fails to eliminate the popping noise that results from clashing waves.

Am I doing something wrong? Does it simply not work in areas of such quiet audio?

steve
Site Admin
Posts: 81629
Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2007 11:43 am
Operating System: Linux *buntu

Re: waveform position indicators

Post by steve » Fri Sep 16, 2016 9:50 am

plunderingsloth wrote: Am I doing something wrong? Does it simply not work in areas of such quiet audio?
I think that the problem is not the amplitude, but the frequency. The frequency of that big slow wave looks to be about 14 Hz - the distance between consecutive peaks is about 0.07 seconds (wavelength = 1/frequency). The distance that the end of the selection would need to move to find a zero crossing point is about 1/4 cycle (about 0.0175 seconds, which is about 770 samples). That's too far for the zero crossing detection.

The "noise" shown in your example is mostly sub-sonic rumble. The solution is to fix that first by using a high-pass filter.
What is it a recording of? The type of audio is important when deciding the best kind of filter to use.
9/10 questions are answered in the FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS (FAQ)

plunderingsloth
Posts: 4
Joined: Fri Sep 16, 2016 3:18 am
Operating System: Windows 10

Re: waveform position indicators

Post by plunderingsloth » Sat Sep 17, 2016 3:59 am

Hey Steve,

This is a voiceover recording, and the selection in the picture is my room tone.

Generally, I cut out bad takes first and THEN perform a high pass filter set at an 80Hz frequency, but the bits where I made the cuts leave a popping sound.

I found out that "Find Zero Crossings" is supposed to help eliminate the popping sound, but--as mentioned--it doesn't actually quite line up at the axis.

Is there something I can do here to eliminate the need to manually line the cursor up at 0 crossings?

kozikowski
Forum Staff
Posts: 69374
Joined: Thu Aug 02, 2007 5:57 pm
Operating System: macOS 10.13 High Sierra

Re: waveform position indicators

Post by kozikowski » Sat Sep 17, 2016 5:19 am

I cut out bad takes first and THEN perform a high pass filter set at an 80Hz frequency
I would so strip out the rumble first. Many microphones create their own rumble and it doesn't stop at 20Hz, the lower limit of hearing. Many microphones are still generating digital garbage down at 2Hz and 3Hz. That data gets into effects and filtering tools and makes them act funny.

Koz

steve
Site Admin
Posts: 81629
Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2007 11:43 am
Operating System: Linux *buntu

Re: waveform position indicators

Post by steve » Sat Sep 17, 2016 8:44 am

plunderingsloth wrote:This is a voiceover recording,
Then it's safe to take out frequencies below 80 Hz (for music you would usually want to retain frequencies down to at least 50 Hz).
Has koz pointed you to the "low roll-off for speech" preset for the Equalization effect?
plunderingsloth wrote:Generally, I cut out bad takes first and THEN perform a high pass filter set at an 80Hz frequency
As koz wrote, better the other way round - deal with DC offset and rumble first. A rumble filter will take out DC offset, so if you use a rumble filter that takes care of both issues.
9/10 questions are answered in the FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS (FAQ)

Post Reply