Compressor vs SC4
Forum rules
If you require help using Audacity, please post on the forum board relevant to your operating system:
Windows
Mac OS X
GNU/Linux and Unix-like
If you require help using Audacity, please post on the forum board relevant to your operating system:
Windows
Mac OS X
GNU/Linux and Unix-like
Compressor vs SC4
What major differences for similar settings?
SC4 does allow more extreme settings. Also a soft knee, however that helps.
SC4 does allow more extreme settings. Also a soft knee, however that helps.
Re: Compressor vs SC4
Probably the biggest difference: SC4 does not use lookahead.
9/10 questions are answered in the FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS (FAQ)
Re: Compressor vs SC4
Aha. That's a big deal. So it simulates a real time compressor, with the limitations of such.
Re: Compressor vs SC4
Whether that is a "limitation" depends on whether you want that behaviour or not 
Some good effects can be achieved by using the SC4 followed by a limiter (which is a common configuration when using hardware devices).
Some good effects can be achieved by using the SC4 followed by a limiter (which is a common configuration when using hardware devices).
9/10 questions are answered in the FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS (FAQ)
Re: Compressor vs SC4
Reverse the track , apply SC4 , then reverse it back : now you have lookahead compression ( I think
)
Re: Compressor vs SC4
If you want lookahead, probably better to use a compressor that has lookaheadTrebor wrote:Reverse the track , apply SC4 , then reverse it back : now you have lookahead compression ( I think)
Personally I find using a compressor well without real time adjustments is difficult enough without Preview playing reversed audio.
9/10 questions are answered in the FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS (FAQ)
Re: Compressor vs SC4
Do you have an opinion for a good limiter effect for speech?
I understan d limiting is compresson with some lookahead, high threshold, short attack, and high ratio.. Is te Hard Limiter really an infinity to one clipper?
Should I limit before or after other compresson?
I understan d limiting is compresson with some lookahead, high threshold, short attack, and high ratio.. Is te Hard Limiter really an infinity to one clipper?
Should I limit before or after other compresson?
Re: Compressor vs SC4
if you are only wanting to apply a modest amount of limiting, I like this one: http://wiki.audacityteam.org/wiki/Nyqui ... er_.282.29Paul L wrote:Do you have an opinion for a good limiter effect for speech?
For more aggressive limiting, I'd go for: http://forum.audacityteam.org/viewtopic ... 98#p150498
(I've been considering changing the name of "brickwall.ny" because there is some confusion between this and a "clipping" effect. "brickwall.ny" is a "limiter" not a "clipping" effect.
If you mean the LADSPA effect, then yes it is a clipping effect, but also provides a degree of "reconstruction" (adding back a scaled version of the peaks) so as to moderate the hardness. There are also a couple of "soft clipping" effects here:Paul L wrote:Is te Hard Limiter really an infinity to one clipper?
http://wiki.audacityteam.org/wiki/Nyqui ... Limiter_II
http://wiki.audacityteam.org/wiki/Nyqui ... imiter_III
Generally I would apply compression first, particularly when using a compressor that does not use lookahead (such as SC4).Paul L wrote:Should I limit before or after other compresson?
If the uncompressed audio has occasional high transients, then you may want to use a limiter to moderate those first (more likely with music than voice recording).
For performing "loudness maximizing" it can be useful to apply limiting both before and after. The first pass to handle transients, and the second pass to squeeze out just a bit more loudness after using a lookahead compressor.
9/10 questions are answered in the FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS (FAQ)