Re: Chris's Compressor effect on CD burns???
Posted: Wed Aug 25, 2010 1:36 am
Steve:
Thanks for the continued help.
I just burned a bunch of songs with Chris at default setting except I chose .98 amplitude on the output rather than .99.
I am generally happy with the results except for one song. It still plays noticeably louder than the other 32. The other 32 do not differ noticeably in volume. Before this default compression test, there were 4 or 5 that had slight noticeable differences--so the compressor is having some desirable effects.
After compression and before compression waves for that still problematic song are shown here.
Do you see anything in the before waveform that would lead you to believe it might still be louder than the others after compression---i.e., not react as the other songs did to compression and amplitude choices in Chris? The song is question is a circa 1960 country recording.
Entirely possible my technique is bad---given that my goal is equal volume across 33 tracks, should I be running all 33 through a compressor---or only certain songs (the quiet ones, the loud ones, whatever)???
If that is true, it may be less labor-intensive to not use a compressor at all and go back to the old manual "test burn and then adjust a few songs for a reburn".
The remedy for that one song might be to compress it more or less than the others, but then I am back to trial and error and fiddling--which I had hoped to avoid.
Any comments appreciated.
Thanks for the continued help.
I just burned a bunch of songs with Chris at default setting except I chose .98 amplitude on the output rather than .99.
I am generally happy with the results except for one song. It still plays noticeably louder than the other 32. The other 32 do not differ noticeably in volume. Before this default compression test, there were 4 or 5 that had slight noticeable differences--so the compressor is having some desirable effects.
After compression and before compression waves for that still problematic song are shown here.
Do you see anything in the before waveform that would lead you to believe it might still be louder than the others after compression---i.e., not react as the other songs did to compression and amplitude choices in Chris? The song is question is a circa 1960 country recording.
Entirely possible my technique is bad---given that my goal is equal volume across 33 tracks, should I be running all 33 through a compressor---or only certain songs (the quiet ones, the loud ones, whatever)???
If that is true, it may be less labor-intensive to not use a compressor at all and go back to the old manual "test burn and then adjust a few songs for a reburn".
The remedy for that one song might be to compress it more or less than the others, but then I am back to trial and error and fiddling--which I had hoped to avoid.
Any comments appreciated.