Yes, that's what a piano should sound like. Disregarding the clicks and noises, a very fine example.kozikowski wrote:the Lincoln Center performance
Improving the sound of a real piano recording
Forum rules
If you require help using Audacity, please post on the forum board relevant to your operating system:
Windows
Mac OS X
GNU/Linux and Unix-like
If you require help using Audacity, please post on the forum board relevant to your operating system:
Windows
Mac OS X
GNU/Linux and Unix-like
Re: Improving the sound of a real piano recording
9/10 questions are answered in the FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS (FAQ)
-
kozikowski
- Forum Staff
- Posts: 69374
- Joined: Thu Aug 02, 2007 5:57 pm
- Operating System: macOS 10.13 High Sierra
Re: Improving the sound of a real piano recording
I believe that was a fourteen year old kid. Depressing, isn't it?
Anyway I really wanted something well recorded to compare. I can start imagining all sorts of errors and start to discount my impressions. I put the noise down to this performance being broadcast on the fourth digital channel of a quad in LA. Still, it shouldn't sound like a sparking hair dryer.
There's room here for a joke that since it's a digital transmission, the noise is clear, perfect, and absolutely repeatable from now on.
Koz
Anyway I really wanted something well recorded to compare. I can start imagining all sorts of errors and start to discount my impressions. I put the noise down to this performance being broadcast on the fourth digital channel of a quad in LA. Still, it shouldn't sound like a sparking hair dryer.
There's room here for a joke that since it's a digital transmission, the noise is clear, perfect, and absolutely repeatable from now on.
Koz
-
waxcylinder
- Forum Staff
- Posts: 14685
- Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2007 11:03 am
- Operating System: Windows 10
Re: Improving the sound of a real piano recording
Koz,kozikowski wrote:
There's room here for a joke that since it's a digital transmission, the noise is clear, perfect, and absolutely repeatable from now on.
Koz
try telling that joke to our UK government and the BBC who have developed a "cunning plan" to remove our current FM services (including our serious music channel Radio 3) from FM and place the lot on wonderful digital. This is apparently so that they can offer more channels are therefore "more choice" on the digital spectrum. The FM spectrum is apparently planned to be relased for broadcasting ultra-local (read parochial) broadcasting.
Now apart from the degradation of quality due to the compression used - plus the dropouts and digital artifacts where reception is poor - each household in the UK has several, often many, FM radios (often including expensive hi-fi FM tuners) as do our cars/lorries/trucks - so they will likely just become electronic junk if this plan goes through.
What a great joke eh? I for one am definitely NOT laughing ...
WC
________________________________________FOR INSTANT HELP: (Click on Link below)
* * * * * FAQ * * * * * Tutorials * * * * * Audacity Manual * * * * *
* * * * * FAQ * * * * * Tutorials * * * * * Audacity Manual * * * * *
Re: Improving the sound of a real piano recording
The normal bit rate for Radio 3 is 192kbps, but...waxcylinder wrote:try telling that joke to our UK government and the BBC who have developed a "cunning plan" to remove our current FM services (including our serious music channel Radio 3) from FM and place the lot on wonderful digital.
"When part-time services are broadcast (such as 5 live sports extra), the bit rate of Radio 3 and/or Radio 4 is reduced."
http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio/help/faq/dab_bitrates.shtml
I'm not sure if this applies or not if you are listening with the BBC iPlayer.
(Radio 4 is a mere 128kbps - both 3 and 4 use joint stereo)
9/10 questions are answered in the FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS (FAQ)