Page 1 of 1
Stereo vs. Mono?
Posted: Wed Sep 01, 2010 12:43 pm
by chillowack
I recently read in the Audacity tips that recording with mono tracks is recommended, since recording in stereo uses up twice as much space.
So I wanted to ask some of the seasoned users here:
1) What is the difference (practically speaking) between stereo and mono?
2) When do you record in stereo, and when do you use mono?
Thanks for your input. I may need to revise my approach here (I've been using stereo for everything).
Re: Stereo vs. Mono?
Posted: Wed Sep 01, 2010 3:03 pm
by steve
It depends on what you are recording.
If you are recording from a single microphone, that is a mono source, so there is not much point in recording a stereo track (unless you have some overriding reason to do so).
If you are recording from a stereo cassette player then you will probably want to record in stereo.
Re: Stereo vs. Mono?
Posted: Wed Sep 01, 2010 9:05 pm
by kozikowski
<<<(unless you have some overriding reason to do so).>>>
My overriding reason for recording a mono microphone in stereo is delivery. I know my editor is expecting a stereo sound file no matter what the performance.
You're right. Most of the time you don't need stereo and the files sizes are half what they are in stereo. Recording a talk show is almost a complete waste of time in stereo.
There are production reasons for recording in stereo -- or more accurately in two channel. The Pamela software package for recording Skype phone calls produces a file with you on one side and the performer on the other. It allows you to do production and editing on one voice without the other.
Koz
Re: Stereo vs. Mono?
Posted: Thu Sep 02, 2010 2:42 pm
by chillowack
Thanks guys, this is instructive.