Audacity for Mac less powerful than Audacity for Windows?
Forum rules
Audacity 1.2.x is now obsolete. Please use the current Audacity 2.1.x version.
Mac 0S X 10.3 and earlier are no longer supported but you can download legacy versions of Audacity for those systems HERE.
Audacity 1.2.x is now obsolete. Please use the current Audacity 2.1.x version.
Mac 0S X 10.3 and earlier are no longer supported but you can download legacy versions of Audacity for those systems HERE.
-
allencmcbride
- Posts: 149
- Joined: Wed Jul 30, 2008 2:02 am
- Operating System: Please select
Re: Audacity for Mac less powerful than Audacity for Windows
"Leopard" is just a nickname for Mac OS 10.5. So you've answered your own question: The version of Leopard you have is 10.5.6. Correct me if I'm misunderstanding your question. --Allen
-
kozikowski
- Forum Staff
- Posts: 68902
- Joined: Thu Aug 02, 2007 5:57 pm
- Operating System: macOS 10.13 High Sierra
Re: Audacity for Mac less powerful than Audacity for Windows
Click Apple > About This Mac.
You can Click Apple > About This Mac > Hardware and it will tell you the model name. Mac Mini in my case.
Koz
You can Click Apple > About This Mac > Hardware and it will tell you the model name. Mac Mini in my case.
Koz
Re: Audacity for Mac less powerful than Audacity for Windows
Okay ... MacBook5,1, Intel Core 2 Duo, 2.4 GHz, 4 GB RAM, MacOS X 10.5.6.
Audacity Version is 1.37.
Martin
Audacity Version is 1.37.
Martin
-
kozikowski
- Forum Staff
- Posts: 68902
- Joined: Thu Aug 02, 2007 5:57 pm
- Operating System: macOS 10.13 High Sierra
Re: Audacity for Mac less powerful than Audacity for Windows
Oops. Sorry. That's:
You can Click Apple > About This Mac > More Info... > Hardware and it will tell you the model name. Mac Mini in my case.
You can Click Apple > About This Mac > More Info... > Hardware and it will tell you the model name. Mac Mini in my case.
-
kozikowski
- Forum Staff
- Posts: 68902
- Joined: Thu Aug 02, 2007 5:57 pm
- Operating System: macOS 10.13 High Sierra
Re: Audacity for Mac less powerful than Audacity for Windows
I could make it run with soundflower. Thanks everybody for your help!