wma vs mp3 and editor
Forum rules
Audacity 1.2.x is now obsolete. Please use the current Audacity 2.1.x version.
The final version of Audacity for Windows 98/ME is the legacy 2.0.0 version.
Audacity 1.2.x is now obsolete. Please use the current Audacity 2.1.x version.
The final version of Audacity for Windows 98/ME is the legacy 2.0.0 version.
wma vs mp3 and editor
Hi,
I have two questions.
1) Which is better wma or mp3. I'm just an ordinary listener with no special requirements.
2) What is a good editor for pasting wma or mp3 files together, so that they will play in succession, as one piece?
Thanks,
........ john
I have two questions.
1) Which is better wma or mp3. I'm just an ordinary listener with no special requirements.
2) What is a good editor for pasting wma or mp3 files together, so that they will play in succession, as one piece?
Thanks,
........ john
Re: wma vs mp3 and editor
What do you mean by "better"?shinnen wrote:Which is better wma or mp3.
For sound quality, WAV and FLAC are better than either of them.
As a (highly) compressed format for music, Ogg Vorbis has the advantage of being open source.
For extreme compression of voice recordings, Speex is the best. http://www.speex.org/
Audacity is a good audio editor (although the deterioration in sound quality when working with lossy formats is cumulative).
9/10 questions are answered in the FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS (FAQ)
Re: wma vs mp3 and editor
And what do you mean by compression?stevethefiddle wrote: As a (highly) compressed format for music, Ogg Vorbis has the advantage of being open source.
For extreme compression of voice recordings, Speex is the best. http://www.speex.org/
Re: wma vs mp3 and editor
9/10 questions are answered in the FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS (FAQ)
Re: wma vs mp3 and editor
Hi,
"Which is better?" I just knew you'd ask what I mean by this. Well..... I'm not sure. I guess, sound quality at a comparable file size, in a 'common' format', a format that I can send to friends and expect that they won't have problems playing (music). I don't know if this helps.
When you say 'lousy formats' does that include mp3 and wma?
As regards an editor. This was a poor choice of terms. Right now I want to join together a few songs into one file, so that they'll play end to end, so to speak. WMP rips them from the cd in wma, so it would be nice if I can join those. I suppose I could convert them to something else, or rip them as mp3. I'm not really sure how to phrase this, but I hope you get the picture.
..... john
"Which is better?" I just knew you'd ask what I mean by this. Well..... I'm not sure. I guess, sound quality at a comparable file size, in a 'common' format', a format that I can send to friends and expect that they won't have problems playing (music). I don't know if this helps.
When you say 'lousy formats' does that include mp3 and wma?
As regards an editor. This was a poor choice of terms. Right now I want to join together a few songs into one file, so that they'll play end to end, so to speak. WMP rips them from the cd in wma, so it would be nice if I can join those. I suppose I could convert them to something else, or rip them as mp3. I'm not really sure how to phrase this, but I hope you get the picture.
..... john
Re: wma vs mp3 and editor
There is not much difference between Ogg, MP3 or WMA in terms of sound quality.shinnen wrote:I guess, sound quality at a comparable file size, in a 'common' format', a format that I can send to friends and expect that they won't have problems playing (music).
Ogg is possibly slightly higher quality,
MP3 is the most common,
"Lossy" not "lousy".shinnen wrote:When you say 'lousy formats' does that include mp3 and wma?
Lossy vs. Lossless
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Data_compr ... ompression
For sound quality, if you want, or may want to do any editing of the audio, it would be better to rip in a lossless format such as WAV. You can use "Exact Audio Copy" for the very best quality, or "C-Dex" for faster copies. Both programs are free.shinnen wrote:Right now I want to join together a few songs into one file, so that they'll play end to end, so to speak. WMP rips them from the cd in wma, so it would be nice if I can join those
You can then edit to your hearts content, and Export as WAV (for backup copies, or if you want to burn to CD) and/or MP3 for smaller files suitable for internet use and MP3 players.
If you use Audacity 1.3 there are Export pre-sets for the quality level for mp3 encoding. You will need to install LAME in order to export as mp3.
http://audacityteam.org/help/faq?s=inst ... m=lame-mp3
9/10 questions are answered in the FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS (FAQ)
Re: wma vs mp3 and editor
Hi Steve,
Thanks for replying.
Lossy not Lousy. Oops! Sorry
So, in your opinion would I be better off using one of the program you mentioned, or Audacity?
....... john
Thanks for replying.
Lossy not Lousy. Oops! Sorry
So, in your opinion would I be better off using one of the program you mentioned, or Audacity?
....... john
Re: wma vs mp3 and editor
My recommendation would be to use Exact Audio Copy or C-Dex to rip the CD to WAV, then use Audacity to edit the ripped files. To export from Audacity as MP3, you will need to install LAME.shinnen wrote:So, in your opinion would I be better off using one of the program you mentioned, or Audacity?
http://audacityteam.org/help/faq?s=install&i=lame-mp3
9/10 questions are answered in the FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS (FAQ)
Re: wma vs mp3 and editor
Hi Steve,
Great! That's what I'll do then. I already have lame installed, so that's no problem.
Thanks,
... john
Great! That's what I'll do then. I already have lame installed, so that's no problem.
Thanks,
... john
Re: wma vs mp3 and editor
Hi Steve,
Well, I downloaded Exact Audio Copy and extracted the 8 tracks I want to splice together; however Audacity would not open them all without crashing, so I saved individually to projects. But I still can't open them all together in Audacity (crash!). They a are total of 380 mbs, but mine is not a very powerful system (p3 1300 mhz/ 500 mbs ram). Is there anyway of putting these together?
Thanks,
John
P.S. CDex made my system crash (blue screen), and would not run. Perhaps because I'm using Windows ME. I don't know.
Well, I downloaded Exact Audio Copy and extracted the 8 tracks I want to splice together; however Audacity would not open them all without crashing, so I saved individually to projects. But I still can't open them all together in Audacity (crash!). They a are total of 380 mbs, but mine is not a very powerful system (p3 1300 mhz/ 500 mbs ram). Is there anyway of putting these together?
Thanks,
John
P.S. CDex made my system crash (blue screen), and would not run. Perhaps because I'm using Windows ME. I don't know.