# Rendered track increase in volume

**URL:** <https://forum.audacityteam.org/t/rendered-track-increase-in-volume/72304>\
**Category:** macOS\
**Created:** [March 27, 2023, 11:23pm UTC](https://forum.audacityteam.org/t/rendered-track-increase-in-volume/72304 "2023-03-27T23:23:13Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 2\
**Page:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Helder](https://forum.audacityteam.org/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/h/9e8a1a/32.png) [@Helder](https://forum.audacityteam.org/u/Helder)\
**Post date:** [March 30, 2023, 11:21am UTC](https://forum.audacityteam.org/t/rendered-track-increase-in-volume/72304/24 "2023-03-30T11:21:49Z")

</div>

> [@billw58](#):
>
> I’ve tried to reproduce your problem using your effects stack, without luck.
> 
> Can you do without the _Master_ effect? Try removing it, then moving the _Compress_ effect to the bottom of the stack. You really want to do compression as the last step, anyway.
> 
> As far as I can tell the _Master_ effect is some kind of compressor/limiter (possibly multi-band, possibly with look-ahead). The _Compress_ effect might give you the results you want.
> 
> You could also try the AudioUnit _Multi-band Compressor_ effect at the bottom of the stack.
> 
> – Bill

Hi Bill,

Yes, I can get a nice result by using two compressors (one at the beginning and one at the end) and tweaking a bit more the EQ, instead of using the Master effect.

Thanks for your support.  
👌

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![system](https://forum.audacityteam.org/uploads/default/original/1X/81a69b20bcd548215067cfaceccc8a10bfa2d176.png) [@system](https://forum.audacityteam.org/u/system)\
**Post date:** [April 26, 2023, 11:23pm UTC](https://forum.audacityteam.org/t/rendered-track-increase-in-volume/72304/25 "2023-04-26T23:23:50Z")

</div>

Closed on April 26, 2023, 11:23pm UTC

This topic was automatically closed after 30 days. New replies are no longer allowed.

[Previous page](https://forum.audacityteam.org/t/rendered-track-increase-in-volume/72304.md?page=1)