Audacity Forum

... healthy negative reinforcement, how bi-curiuos is your state, when killing a snake means burning your house down, having your kid pepper spray the help, reincarnated kids needed and .... which is full of edits: Today, on this spicy black bean flavored episode of the morning stream, // some healthy ...

I can browse Lisp code for seq somewhere in my distribution? If you download the Audacity source code, the Nyquist LISP files are in the subdirectory /nyquist/ However, SND-SEQ is not a LISP function, it is one of the primitives written in C. The sourcecode for SND-SEQ is sndseq.c and sndseq.h in /...

I can browse Lisp code for seq somewhere in my distribution?

Is it a macro, not a true function? Does that explain some of the unexpected weirdness Steve and I see?

The "environment" affecting the evaluation of a behavior involves the "lexical environment" of the lisp code in which the behevior object was constructed? They are "closures" somehow? So you mean your code would actually NOT be equivalent to just writing the expansion (...

I think there is a bug in SND-SEQ (which is used by SEQ and SEQREP). The upshot is that SEQ and SEQREP can only see "S" if it is in the first argument. Occurrences of "S" in the second or subsequent arguments are seen as NIL. Thus, this will work: (seq s (osc 60)) and this works:...

... with the settings again and I somehow got it to work. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pNCxK95uX-M I was VERY happy last night thanks for all the help for future reference if someone else has this issue, the screen on audacity looked like this

Thanks for your time and instruction. I see now that it's not the sliders, but the "I" that indicates selection for the noise profile. Appreciate your help!

... :). A shoutout to Snafder for his blog: http://snafder.blogspot.com/2011/01/saving-wav-files-in-ccitt-u-law-format.html?m=1 Thank you all for your help.

Besides, we would usually use 'seqrep' for these cases.
Something like: The behaviour would of course create (or extract) the sound-piece you want.
Perhaps it would be intrsting to see which method yields the most "garbage".

Yes, your [(rest (rest ...))] (or better '(nthcdr 2...)' will be needed if you want to extract individual time pairs. My code just uses the start of the last call as end for the new one. I guess this recursive method works because there will different lexical contexts be established, whereas in the ...