Search found 4782 matches: Search…
Searched query: Search…
- Sun Dec 14, 2014 11:22 am
- Forum: Windows
- Topic: Payment for cleaning up audio file
- Replies: 6
- Views: 601
Re: Payment for cleaning up audio file
a recording with a business partner who we are suing Same difference. Where courts are concerned, pay the money for a proper audio forensics expert with specialised equipment to decipher what's said. The case may depend on it. Audacity is not that sort of specialised software. audio forensics - Goo...
- Sun Dec 14, 2014 8:10 am
- Forum: Audio Processing
- Topic: Anolog - digital conversion process
- Replies: 6
- Views: 1073
Anolog - digital conversion process
Can anyone explain how one individual section, sample or single unit of information within a sound file can contain have several different sounds, an entire orchestra at once if required. Put very simply, surely the information distinguishing the sound of a trombone from that of a timpani or a snare...
- Tue Dec 09, 2014 7:06 pm
- Forum: General Audio Programming
- Topic: Need pointers on adding feature to search pattern
- Replies: 20
- Views: 14174
Re: Need pointers on adding feature to search pattern
Did you see Robert's post near the start of this topic?Earthlark wrote:Any progress on this?
- Tue Dec 09, 2014 6:45 pm
- Forum: General Audio Programming
- Topic: Need pointers on adding feature to search pattern
- Replies: 20
- Views: 14174
Re: Need pointers on adding feature to search pattern
Any progress on this? I sometimes have the need to analyze a track for a specific sound that re-occurs in isolation (no other background noises to interfere) throughout the track and put a marker at those spots. I can't seem to find any programs that do this--seems like something people would use fa...
- Sat Dec 06, 2014 12:14 pm
- Forum: Compiling Audacity
- Topic: I need to compile 2.0 - but failed at first hurdle
- Replies: 4
- Views: 1974
Re: I need to compile 2.0 - but failed at first hurdle
I've just tried to install TortoiseSVN, but it give the message. ....You must install a Windows service pack that contains a newer version of the Windows Installer service. I'm on Win XP SP3 - and there isnt a newer SP is there? Is there somewhere I can ftp the source from? If you want to compile a...
- Fri Dec 05, 2014 7:31 pm
- Forum: macOS
- Topic: Lost files
- Replies: 8
- Views: 673
Re: Lost files
Try a Spotlight Search (upper right of the desktop). Search for the filename. If you replaced the 2.0.2 Audacity folder with the new 2.0.6 folder then it would have been overwritten. Audacity does keep preferences in a separate place, so your settings and adjustments should carry forward, but nothin...
- Fri Dec 05, 2014 7:54 am
- Forum: Audio Processing
- Topic: Sound quality assessment
- Replies: 14
- Views: 2002
Re: Sound quality assessment
Thanks! The problem there is not in the number of requirements ACX presents, but to follow them if one is not recording in a professional studio. Measuring noise level, checking or inserting room tone at the head and tail, checking RMS etc can be more or less easily automated in a stand alone applic...
- Thu Dec 04, 2014 9:15 pm
- Forum: Windows
- Topic: Audacity 2.0.6 + FFmpeg 2.2.2 = Error 127
- Replies: 10
- Views: 4371
Re: Audacity 2.0.6 + FFmpeg 2.2.2 = Error 127
Hello OK i solved it. I used a filemonitor and it showed that Audacity does not look in the right folder. It first looks for the dll in any other folder thats in the Path first - if any of those folders contains another ffmpeg, Audacity uses that instead of the folder you set in the Audacity option...
- Wed Dec 03, 2014 10:19 pm
- Forum: Windows
- Topic: Radio signal interruption/interference
- Replies: 6
- Views: 1508
Re: Radio signal interruption/interference
So you got the bad single-sideband voice OK? How did you do it? I live mid-way between three Hams. I'd just have them do it. Buy them donuts and they'll do anything. There's no shortage of samples of FSK tones. http://www.nonstopsystems.com/radio/radio-sounds.html The Digital Voice samples sound pr...
- Sun Nov 30, 2014 1:07 pm
- Forum: Nyquist
- Topic: increasing accuracy of Silence Marker
- Replies: 36
- Views: 5942
Re: increasing accuracy of Silence Marker
As far as I can see, the code works correctly and takes the maximum value of the two channels. I'm not sure why you want to multiply by 2. You're aware that the -30 dB threshold is afterwards -26 dB? Instead of the snd-avg function you can take the rms function instead. (rms s >target-samplerate<) w...