Audacity Forum

abhinav wrote:i hav rec a violin solo and it sucks a bit
i can hear the sweaks and crees

Are you recording it too close-mic'd ?

WC

See this page from the Manual: http://manual.audacityteam.org/o/man/sp ... racks.html

WC

frustration22 wrote: I have quite a number of old audio cassette tapes that I'm trying to
burn to audio cd's to play in the car.

In which case the full set of tutorials from which this one comes may well be useful to you too: http://manual.audacityteam.org/o/man/tu ... to_cd.html

WC

See this tutorial from the Audacity Manual: http://manual.audacityteam.org/o/man/bu ... _a_cd.html

Mock-up looks good to me Question: Should the effect remember the last used setting from one session to the next, or should it default to 1 repeat when Audacity is restarted? Don't most other effects remember the last used setting when re=opening Audacity (provided the pluginxxx.cfg files haven't be...

... So I think the text should be "Number of repeats to add" or similar +1 for that (I like good labelling on the tin, as you know) and I quite like the idea of seeing the original selection length and the new after-repeat length - and I like the idea of using thus users current format se...

If it just said (as the default): Number of repeats: [ 1 ] which then produces "1 repeat" (+ the original), then I think that would be clear and obvious for first time users. Yes, it would be much easier to see and count one original plus one repeat when you first try it out - 10 versus 1...

OK I see, Steve, that you have already posted this bug and Gale has already replied: http://bugzilla.audacityteam.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1060

I've added my comments too.

Peter.

This does raise the question, (and since this needs to be fixed I think it's a good time to address this question), should "Number of times to repeat" mean: a) the number of additional repeats b) the total number of repeats. I think it should be the former "the number of additional r...