Audacity Forum

Yes. Update to Audacity 2.4.2: 2.4.2 fixed the issue, many thanks. I still have issues trying to Append Record but I'll put that in a separate post. Any news from Behringer about making drivers available for 4 channel recording (without ASIO)? The person I ended up getting a response from was from ...

I have my UMC404HD recording 4 tracks to Audacity successfully, but when I click Record, one stereo track plus 2 mono tracks are created. I can just go in and split the stereo track into 2 mono tracks, but I'd rather not have to do it each time. Does anyone know how to fix this? Audacity 2.3.3 Windo...

OK your point has been made very forcefully!

I'll alert Behringer and suggest they sort out the (probable) false positive and make it available on their website as a download again.

Lesson learned.

Hi Steve. I understand your concerns. Lucklily I was wrong in my assumptions about Behringer's support! Had a reply in under an hour with this link:

(which I have removed, as it generated a warning when I submitted it to virustotal. 2 snags out of 73)

I'm pretty certain that 3.29 will work. This post: https://forum.audacityteam.org/viewtopic.php?t=99068 is from 2018 - the driver in use then was probably 3.29 which was dated 2015. The OP's device info shown by Audacity was: Device ID: 17 Device name: Line (2- BEHRINGER UMC404HD 192k) Host name: Wi...

That's my understanding. I don't have 3.29 and I can't see it on the website. See https://www.reddit.com/r/audacity/comme ... _umc404hd/ and also viewtopic.php?t=109837

Win 10 1803 x64 Audacity 2.3.3 I have just acquired a Behringer UMC404HD 4 channel USB interface and want to use Audacity to record 4 mono tracks. Using the current driver 4.59, the 404's inputs are exposed as 2 stereo inputs and you can only select 1and2 or 3and4. This seems to be a known issue tha...

Hi Steve I'm having the same issue. When I look at the Sound Recording Devices list I see 2 UMC404HD's, 2 channels in each one.

Thanks for your input. What you are outlining might be suitable, I'll need to give it some thought. With my current setup (when it works properly!) I have scheduled tasks on the 2 machines that perform the sync to/from the cloud, so that I can pick up from where I left off on either machine without ...

Hi,

What setting was it was that caused the weird behaviour?

Thanks,
Ross