Search found 59476 matches

by steve
Sun May 23, 2021 8:58 pm
Forum: macOS
Topic: Converting Audacity Sound Wave to Numerical form and vice versa
Replies: 24
Views: 309

Re: Converting Audacity Sound Wave to Numerical form and vice versa

Please attach the file that you are trying to import. (See: viewtopic.php?f=49&t=64936)
by steve
Sun May 23, 2021 8:56 pm
Forum: macOS
Topic: Converting Audacity Sound Wave to Numerical form and vice versa
Replies: 24
Views: 309

Re: Converting Audacity Sound Wave to Numerical form and vice versa

CreativeKick wrote:
Sun May 23, 2021 8:33 pm
I am choosing a csv file - will that not work?
The "Index" column is only created for .txt files.
by steve
Sun May 23, 2021 8:49 pm
Forum: Windows
Topic: Can Audacity make vibrato smoother?
Replies: 4
Views: 134

Re: Can Audacity make vibrato smoother?

You could try the Limiter effect (with "Soft Limit" setting).
Amplify the track first (default settings) so that the high points of the tremolo go to top / bottom of the track, then apply the Limiter with default settings. That will reduce the peaks down to -3 dB.

Tracks000.png
Tracks000.png (26.82 KiB) Viewed 106 times
by steve
Sun May 23, 2021 7:35 pm
Forum: macOS
Topic: Converting Audacity Sound Wave to Numerical form and vice versa
Replies: 24
Views: 309

Re: Converting Audacity Sound Wave to Numerical form and vice versa

1000, Linear, (File Pathway), Time Indexed, None, Blank, L-R on same Line, Yes. If you select some silence (1000 samples or more) with those settings, AND the file name ends with ".txt", then you will get: 0.00000 0.00000 0.00002 0.00000 0.00005 0.00000 0.00007 0.00000 ... Note that the &...
by steve
Sun May 23, 2021 6:37 pm
Forum: Windows
Topic: Can Audacity make vibrato smoother?
Replies: 4
Views: 134

Re: Can Audacity make vibrato smoother?

It looks like you mean "tremolo" (varying amplitude) rather than "vibrato" (varying pitch).

If you are wanting to create a gentle tremolo, try Audacity's Tremolo effect: https://manual.audacityteam.org/man/tremolo.html
by steve
Sun May 23, 2021 6:34 pm
Forum: macOS
Topic: Converting Audacity Sound Wave to Numerical form and vice versa
Replies: 24
Views: 309

Re: Converting Audacity Sound Wave to Numerical form and vice versa

Steve, did you get my private message showing you my settings? I got your PM but: 1. Attachments are not permitted, so I've not seen the screenshot. 2. I spend a lot of time helping people on this forum, but I don't provide support via PM, email, telephone, Skype, Zoom, or anything else. Please jus...
by steve
Sun May 23, 2021 4:46 pm
Forum: macOS
Topic: Converting Audacity Sound Wave to Numerical form and vice versa
Replies: 24
Views: 309

Re: Converting Audacity Sound Wave to Numerical form and vice versa

CreativeKick wrote:
Sun May 23, 2021 4:38 pm
In answer to the first post - No I don’t get that, I get a single column of zeros
What settings are you using in Sample Data Export?
by steve
Sun May 23, 2021 4:27 pm
Forum: macOS
Topic: Converting Audacity Sound Wave to Numerical form and vice versa
Replies: 24
Views: 309

Re: Converting Audacity Sound Wave to Numerical form and vice versa

With the import, I am getting an error message that says 'The file must contain only plain ASCII text. Invalid byte 255 at byte number:1' Any ideas what this means? What is the first line of the file that you are trying to import? What format is the file that you are trying to import, and how did y...
by steve
Sun May 23, 2021 4:26 pm
Forum: macOS
Topic: Converting Audacity Sound Wave to Numerical form and vice versa
Replies: 24
Views: 309

Re: Converting Audacity Sound Wave to Numerical form and vice versa

When I try to export time indexed data I get two duplicate columns of the 'y value' rather than one column with the x values. Are you sure? Try selecting some absolute silence ("Generate menu > Silence"). When it is a mono track with a sample rate of 44100, the exported data should look l...
by steve
Sun May 23, 2021 2:29 pm
Forum: Audacity 3.x Feedback and Reviews
Topic: Actual Rate
Replies: 20
Views: 995

Re: Actual Rate

Personally I think that the message is sufficiently clear as it is. Yes, we could make it more explicit, for example: "Actual sample rate of current recording (Hz)", but we have opted for brevity over verbosity. The fact that the other end of the Selection Toolbar says: "Project Rate ...