Audacity Forum

tourofitaly wrote:Im using a linux system with Alsa, I've tried mplayer, and xmms. But I've also tried windows XP and mediaplayer, and the sound seems to be there too.

Are you using the same speakers/headphones on all of these tests?

Internal microphones are frequently very noisy, but the best upgrade path will depend on the type of recording that you are wanting to do.

Are you sure that it's the hard drive spinning up and not a fan kicking in?

For latest version of this plug-in, please download from the Audacity wiki: http://wiki.audacityteam.org/wiki/Nyqui ... Noise_Gate

tourofitaly wrote:

steve wrote: Do you mean that the "artefact" is unchanged, or that it is mostly removed but still detectable?

It sounds unchanged.

In that case I've no idea what "glitch" you are talking about (and I don't think that anyone else has either).

Is there any way to tighten the bands a bit further, Yes, you can reduce the bandwidth of the audio signal, for example: (setq CarrierFreq 17500) (highpass8 (lowpass8 (mult 2 (lowpass8 (highpass8 s 300) 3000) (hzosc CarrierFreq)) CarrierFreq) CarrierFreq) but the trade-off is that the sound quality...

Where are you trying to export to?
Are you able to Export a single file to that location?

I'm curious: Why are you recording in such low quality? After exporting (saving) it as a .m4a file (after downloading ffmpeg library), I tried to open that file. But it does not open and the error comes as - "File may be invalid or corrupted". What "Options" did you have set? Whi...

In the ' before-and-after.wav' attachment, the artifact still seems to be present. Do you mean that the "artefact" is unchanged, or that it is mostly removed but still detectable? Looks like you’ve changed the equalization on the word “under“ : cutting back frequencies above ~6.5KHz … I u...

Are you wanting to do something like this?