See here: http://web.ncf.ca/aa508/Software/spatial/
The program requires RAW PCM audio, mono 16 bit 11025 Hz sample rate.
It's open source, so if you know how to program you'll be able to modify it to suit your needs.
Search found 59476 matches
- Tue Feb 07, 2012 4:51 am
- Forum: Audio Processing
- Topic: Creating Virtual Studios
- Replies: 4
- Views: 621
- Tue Feb 07, 2012 4:15 am
- Forum: New Plug-Ins
- Topic: 78rpm EQ Curve Generator
- Replies: 56
- Views: 22836
Re: 78rpm EQ Curve Generator
No, on Win XP (real machine). Thanks for the confirmation. (if (and (windowsp)(= (length (setdir ".") 3))) ..... ) It looks like there is a neater way. At around line 98 in writefile.ny ;; Test if path is working directory (unless (or (equal path (setdir ".")) ;; allow for Windo...
- Tue Feb 07, 2012 3:19 am
- Forum: Nyquist
- Topic: Sound Finder / Silence Finder improvements
- Replies: 106
- Views: 35882
Re: Sound Finder / Silence Finder improvements
"Minimum labelled length" Thanks, I like that best too. Such a small difference, but I think it makes a big difference. I'll go with that for now (we can change it later if we think we need to). label the first sound from 0.0 to 2.0 and the second sound from 2.2 to 4.2. I want to allow th...
- Tue Feb 07, 2012 2:48 am
- Forum: Windows
- Topic: Losing quality when editing only WAV files?
- Replies: 6
- Views: 3860
Re: Losing quality when editing only WAV files?
Good question:kozikowski wrote:You know the next question is "which effects are those -- specifically?"
Answer: Items in the "Edit" menu, and that's all.
(Cut, Delete, Trim, Split, Paste, Split Delete, ...)
- Tue Feb 07, 2012 2:19 am
- Forum: Windows
- Topic: Losing quality when editing only WAV files?
- Replies: 6
- Views: 3860
Re: Losing quality when editing only WAV files?
I believe you can set Audacity Preferences so the sound format (44100, 16-bit, Stereo, for example) exactly matches the clips. Then the whole process should be transparent. It will be "transparent" (no audible difference) but it won't be "bit perfect" because Audacity still pass...
- Tue Feb 07, 2012 2:00 am
- Forum: New Plug-Ins
- Topic: 78rpm EQ Curve Generator
- Replies: 56
- Views: 22836
Re: 78rpm EQ Curve Generator
The code could be soooo much simpler if we didn't need to support Windows 
- Tue Feb 07, 2012 1:57 am
- Forum: New Plug-Ins
- Topic: 78rpm EQ Curve Generator
- Replies: 56
- Views: 22836
Re: 78rpm EQ Curve Generator
In fact I specifically tested this time to see if it was fixed. And it's not fixed is it? From what I recall, this wasn't easy to fix? I don't see a "neat" fix for it. It's a Windows specific inconsistency, so we'll need to conditionally test for Windows, then test for if the path is a dr...
- Tue Feb 07, 2012 1:45 am
- Forum: Mac OS X
- Topic: need to batch normalize and adjust volume
- Replies: 1
- Views: 8831
Re: need to batch normalize and adjust volume
Create a "Chain" containing the Normalize effect, followed by an Export function.
See these links for information about how to use Chains:
http://manual.audacityteam.org/man/Edit_Chains
http://manual.audacityteam.org/man/Apply_Chain
See these links for information about how to use Chains:
http://manual.audacityteam.org/man/Edit_Chains
http://manual.audacityteam.org/man/Apply_Chain
- Tue Feb 07, 2012 1:36 am
- Forum: New Plug-Ins
- Topic: 78rpm EQ Curve Generator
- Replies: 56
- Views: 22836
Re: 78rpm EQ Curve Generator
There's a bug in "78rpm EQ Curve Generator" that we'd missed. On Windows, if the output path is set to "D:" the path is not found. (Thanks to Edgar for spotting the same problem in writefile.ny ) The problem is that if the working directory is a drive letter, then (setdir "....
- Mon Feb 06, 2012 7:21 pm
- Forum: General Audio Programming
- Topic: expand on Norm's new track name in display
- Replies: 70
- Views: 34143
Re: expand on Norm's new track name in display
You will need to apply the patch manually Possibly a bit too tricky for me as I'm not sure what in the current svn Head conflicts with your patch. If you can tell me the revision number that the patch was created against, then I know how to "roll back" my svn copy to that version. I'd be ...