Audacity Forum

hence why I was trying to find a way of easily opening an Audacity project and reading the data. There isn't really an easy way to do that. There are several approaches that you could take, but none of them (other than exporting via the GUI) is simple. There is some information about this in this t...

I know, you want if ever possible avoid words like "Threshold", "Bias" and so on to keep things grand- parents proof (although my grand pa would most likely not know what karaoke means - even if he would still be alive and could celebrate his 125th birthday). It's a matter of us...

I just need easy and fairly "transparent" access to the data. Converting to wav files is alright, but they are such large files that it can be a little inconvenient. You could export manageable sized sections of the recording as raw PCM format. By default Audacity stores the data in 32 bi...

Enedrox wrote:I would like to open and analyse in C++

What sort of analysis are you hoping to do?

Does this mean I'm not really recording at 192kHz even though Audacity shows "Actual Rate: 192000" on the bottom right of the application window? Let me give an analogy to shed some light on this question. Consider the value "5". "5" is an integer, so has a precision o...

I looked for a function in LISP who would look like in: two things are identical That's right. You have the wrong meaning of "=". In the SAL script it is "assigning", as in: Let a = x + y In your LISP code "eql" is testing equivalence, as in: If x = y ;; set modstep = ...

"Hydrogen" is good.
"Hammerhead" is cool if you're looking for an old school software drum machine.

Do you think I accidentally moved the project files to an incorrect location? The .AUP file and the associated _data folder must both reside in the same folder location as each other. To check if the files still have the correct original names, make a copy (for safety) of the .AUP file, and open it...

It would be nice if this could replace the current vocal removal effect, but sadly I think that it is too slow to be a viable replacement. It would be good though if we could point users that want vocal isolation toward a Nyquist plug-in rather than / as well as to third party applications like Knoc...

The mono/stereo entries simply represent the current and the more advanced technique for the Vocal Removal. In a more specialised version I think that you could miss out the mono option since we already have a tool for that. Doing so will help to differentiate it from the "standard" vocal...