That's 6 out of over 90. How do I know which ones you have tried?rockaround wrote: I tried half of a dozen of them
Search found 59476 matches
- Wed Oct 30, 2013 3:45 pm
- Forum: Windows
- Topic: Audacity 2.0.4 Extra Effects Plugin (Do not work)
- Replies: 3
- Views: 476
Re: Audacity 2.0.4 Extra Effects Plugin (Do not work)
- Wed Oct 30, 2013 3:21 pm
- Forum: Windows
- Topic: PITCH OF VOICE PROBLEM (SOLVED)
- Replies: 71
- Views: 24876
Re: PITCH OF VOICE PROBLEM
Does it sound just a fraction too high, or about an octave too high, or like a chipmunk breathing helium?bwywvgvc wrote:What do you mean - how far off is it??
Also, does it sound too fast?
- Wed Oct 30, 2013 3:16 pm
- Forum: Windows
- Topic: Audacity 2.0.4 Extra Effects Plugin (Do not work)
- Replies: 3
- Views: 476
Re: Audacity 2.0.4 Extra Effects Plugin (Do not work)
Which specific effects have you tried?
These plug-ins are rather old and not made by Audacity, so there's no guarantee that they will all work, though most of them should.
These plug-ins are rather old and not made by Audacity, so there's no guarantee that they will all work, though most of them should.
- Wed Oct 30, 2013 3:14 pm
- Forum: Windows
- Topic: SOUND CLEAR remove periodic sounds
- Replies: 5
- Views: 714
Re: SOUND CLEAR remove periodic sounds
during the tackt there is short sounds "bip" that I wan to remove How often does this occur? Is it infrequent enough to fix each one separately, or does it happen hundreds of times? How regular is the repeat (or is it fairly random)? Please upload a couple of examples of the blips (see he...
- Wed Oct 30, 2013 3:10 pm
- Forum: Windows
- Topic: recording from ambiloop
- Replies: 2
- Views: 734
Re: recording from ambiloop
I think that you need this "Recording audio playing on the computer" information: Recording audio playing on the computer
It's easier to do on some computers than others, so there are several different methods described. Use the one that works best for you.
It's easier to do on some computers than others, so there are several different methods described. Use the one that works best for you.
- Wed Oct 30, 2013 3:05 pm
- Forum: General Audio Programming
- Topic: expand on Norm's new track name in display
- Replies: 70
- Views: 34143
Re: expand on Norm's new track name in display
http://cjoint.com/?CJEktoU7oqD This example would be great ...... for Mac. ;) I think the problem is more about what happens when you click the button. Edgar developed options for font and colour preferences, but the dialogues that then opened were OS dependent (provided by wxWidgets I think). The ...
- Wed Oct 30, 2013 6:23 am
- Forum: Nyquist
- Topic: Memory leaks in Nyquist or the Lisp environment?
- Replies: 18
- Views: 6259
Re: Memory leaks in Nyquist or the Lisp environment?
Hi Paul. Did you get any further isolating this memory leak or working round it?
- Wed Oct 30, 2013 5:24 am
- Forum: Nyquist
- Topic: How to operate on samples directly, e.g. spec f(t)?
- Replies: 5
- Views: 1469
Re: How to operate on samples directly, e.g. spec f(t)?
If you want to run something like this on a long selection, the way to do it would be .... I've been meaning to write an example of this, so here's an example: ;type process ;;; Amplify by +3 dB (setq gain (db-to-linear 3.0)) ;;; DSP function (defun amp (a g) (dotimes (i (length a) a) (setf (aref a...
- Wed Oct 30, 2013 3:01 am
- Forum: Nyquist
- Topic: How to operate on samples directly, e.g. spec f(t)?
- Replies: 5
- Views: 1469
Re: How to operate on samples directly, e.g. spec f(t)?
Is there not some way of doing, e.g... (for i = 0 to [end of array] snd = [whatever I want it to be] end do) ...? Here's a trivial example. Note that this is only suitable for short selections (a few seconds) and is only written for mono tracks. It can be run in the Nyquist Prompt effect: ;;; Ampli...
- Wed Oct 30, 2013 2:28 am
- Forum: Audio Processing
- Topic: Easy button switch Make Stereo Track/Split Stereo Track
- Replies: 5
- Views: 1495
Re: Easy button switch Make Stereo Track/Split Stereo Track
Others have made your suggestion and I think it is a very reasonable request. Indeed it is. Personally I'd like it to go further and allow working with a "group" of tracks in which the group can be easily "exploded" to allow working on individual tracks, or "collapsed"...