Audacity Forum

darshun wrote: I did try to zoom in but I can't click on the exact point of the "flatline" to remove it.

Check that you have not accidentally enabled "Snap To" http://manual.audacityteam.org/o/man/se ... .html#snap

MetZen wrote:I'm trying to run my mbox2 mini with audacity, I set it to use mbox2

How exactly are you doing that?
Remember that we cannot see your computer so we only know as much as you tell.

But as I said, the XLisp 3.0 at xlisp.org is surely not the basis for Nyquist. It is a version of Scheme so that means much incompatibility with 2.0. And it seems nobody has maintained it in a decade. I say we ignore xlisp.org. I see it as Nyquist being a fork from XLisp 2.0 and as such the maintai...

You speak, steve, as if fixing this problem is a certainty for a near term. Is that right? "Near term" is not easy to define for open source projects that are dependent on the available "free time" of unpaid contributors. There has been some preliminary work on version 4 plug-in...

Paul L wrote:XLisp code is distributed with Nyquist code, with no other easily discovered current authoritative repository.

Other than the 9/13/02 archives at http://www.xlisp.org/

Nyquist also contains C code from the Computer Music Toolkit library http://www.ladspa.org/cmt/

I recall XLisp using standard C getenv. Did it expose it as a Lisp function? Nyquist has (GET-ENV "string"). If "string" is an environmental variable, its value is returned, else NIL. "string" is case sensitive on case sensitive operating systems. Then users just need ...

Running time critical applications in a virtual machine is always likely to pose problems. Newer core i3 / i5 processors are better suited as they have built in virtual machine optimisations. Being that Audacity is available for Windows, Mac and Linux, why not run Audacity on real hardware and avoid...

Paul L wrote:Far more use Nyquist effects than write them, I imagine,

Definitely. As Audacity ships a few Nyquist effects I'd guess there would be millions of users of Nyquist effects, (so it's important not to break them )

Whoops, guess it's not even called code. Scripts! Thanks for writing the scripts Steve. I appreciate it so much! "script" / "code" / whatever, the distinction between one and the other is not really important. Traditionally "interpreted languages" have been referred to...

Robert J. H. wrote:How many Downloads has Audacity had over the years?

Tens of millions.