Audacity Forum

Perhaps it would be acceptable to abbreviate Pt: Reg: Invis: or similar? We already use L and R as abbreviation for Left and Right. There's not a problem with "Point" or "Region" (at least in English). The problem is with "behind zero" being rather too long. If it can ...

In that case, perhaps it would be better to have small icons rather than the text "point labels", "region labels", "labels behind zero", and have the text as tooltips (which if I recall, don't work on the track info panel)

Robert J. H. wrote:Audacity should only have one global key combination. Any hotkey after that is passed to Audacity.

Wouldn't that essentially disables using the foreground application? In which case I don't understand how it is preferable to Alt+Tab.

Regarding the size/length of text and localization, how do we get round that for audio track info?
I'm guessing that we don't.

If we want to get this feature accepted into a release (+1) then probably the simpler the better +1 I think three fields (Regions/Points/Before Zero) would fit default label height with the label count alongside. The label track would need to be a little taller to show three lines of text. I'd be h...

Try applying the Amplify effect with default settings after applying the Vocal Remover effect. Does that make a difference?

I don't see that at all. I would have answered almost exactly as Doug did. but you do agree that Audacity does not edit audio files (which was implied by the original question), and you do agree that there is an important difference when alias files are involved. From the original question I think ...

Is there a ready AHK script already posted somewhere? Not that I know of. And if the user employs that script, don't they still have to ensure that FRAPS or whatever application is being used is not already using that key? Absolutely. I don't see how there can be any way round that. I was just sayi...

2) If I make an equalization change to a section of a file, and then make another equalization change, does Audacity put the 2nd change "on top" of the first one so the effect is combined? Or does it revert back to a flat equalization and then apply the 2nd equalization? I"m pretty s...

You could try running a memory test, for example: http://www.memtest86.com/