Audacity Forum

Chilly P wrote:how did I make a copy of the file and get it into Notepad?

I don't use Windows, but, have you tried launching NotePad, then "File menu > Open" and selecting the .AUP file?

Can someone provide basic instructions for set up. Download the "Quickstart Guide" from the "Downloads" section of this page: http://www.behringer.com/EN/Products/X32-RACK.aspx When you have that sorted out, setting up Audacity should be much the same as setting up for recording...

What are you trying to record?

irpheus wrote:Any ideas - or maybe alternative suggestions?

What are the "tests" that you wish to perform, and why do they require such an extreme sample rate?

irpheus wrote:I realize this will also need suitable hardware that can sample at e.g. 1.536 MHz.

When you get the hardware, it will probably dictate what type of drivers are required (it's unlikely to be ASIO as that is designed for audio).

Edgar wrote:Remember, any external sledgehammer must first ensure that Audacity is not currently running

I thought that the main reason for an external application was for when Audacity wouldn't launch.
If Audacity does launch, better to reset preferences from within Audacity.

maybe Gmulti is applying sustained-compression between the attack-threshold being reached and release, ( and not telling me about it ). Yes, perhaps, but Gale was trying to get us to stay on topic so that we could get an actual result ;) It may not be quite as much as you want, and I'd certainly wa...

I have Audacity 2.0.3 The current version is 2.0.6. You can get it here: http://audacityteam.org/download/ I have two tracks. One track is the accompaniment track that has just the music. You mean an "audio file" that has just music? The other track is the listening track that has the mus...

I believe that the user should have access to many more formats: That image doesn't fit on my display. Other than for testing purposes, I only ever use 4 settings, though of course, probably not the same 4 as you ;) I think there must be a more user friendly way of providing choice than one massive...

Gale Andrews wrote:I know I am the only one of us who still likes the RMS meters

Actually, I quite like them, though I prefer the new style meters as the default.