Search found 59476 matches
- Mon Aug 22, 2016 10:27 am
- Forum: Making Music with Audacity
- Topic: Can someone help me remove voice from a song
- Replies: 5
- Views: 1195
Re: Can someone help me remove voice from a song
Audacity 2.1.2 has two effects for removing / reducing vocals from a song. There is no guarantee that either will work. The effectiveness of these effects depend on the amount of stereo separation. Both effects are fully documented in the manual: The old effect: Vocal Remover http://manual.audacityt...
- Mon Aug 22, 2016 9:59 am
- Forum: Windows
- Topic: How to fix loud background music?
- Replies: 3
- Views: 214
Re: How to fix loud background music?
Using the "Analyze" option in the "Vocal Reduction and Isolation" effect (http://manual.audacityteam.org/man/vocal_reduction_and_isolation.html): Pan position: -8.75504e-05 The left and right channels are correlated by about 100 %. This means: - The two channels are identical, i....
- Mon Aug 22, 2016 9:07 am
- Forum: Nyquist
- Topic: Removing Envelope Control Points
- Replies: 15
- Views: 6931
Re: Removing Envelope Control Points
The user said that the Nyquist prompt wasn't in his effect list Yes, that's a bit worrying. The Nyquist Prompt is enabled by default, so should automatically be present in the Effect menu. As they are on OS X, an explanation could be that they have not installed Audacity correctly. That's why I was...
- Sun Aug 21, 2016 8:39 pm
- Forum: Nyquist
- Topic: Removing Envelope Control Points
- Replies: 15
- Views: 6931
Re: Removing Envelope Control Points
This time for the Nyquist prompt (which should really be re-enabled imo) and with the legacy check box disabled: I'm not sure what you mean Robert. By default the Nyquist Prompt is enabled and the legacy checkbox is not selected. Being a bit pedantic, yes this works: ()*track* but it is perhaps a b...
- Sun Aug 21, 2016 1:39 pm
- Forum: Nyquist
- Topic: Removing Envelope Control Points
- Replies: 15
- Views: 6931
Re: Removing Envelope Control Points
The error is "no return statement". It does work in current Audacity if you replace "s" with [return s] OK I see that. The problem is that Audacity is incorrectly guessing that the code is using SAL syntax rather than LISP syntax because there are no parentheses in the code. The...
- Sun Aug 21, 2016 12:07 pm
- Forum: Nyquist
- Topic: Removing Envelope Control Points
- Replies: 15
- Views: 6931
Re: Removing Envelope Control Points
What was the error message?ultramagnus_tcv wrote:The error:
- Sat Aug 20, 2016 1:58 pm
- Forum: Making Music with Audacity
- Topic: My First Song With Audacity :))
- Replies: 10
- Views: 1799
Re: My First Song With Audacity :))
That's very surprising. Your voice has come out much better than I would expect from a laptop mic (certainly very much better than the mic on my budget Acer laptop).S AnShu wrote:I've used default mic ( my laptop's mic ) to record....
- Sat Aug 20, 2016 11:47 am
- Forum: Podcasting with Audacity
- Topic: Two waveforms: Can you tell if one is Inverted?
- Replies: 5
- Views: 1439
Re: Two waveforms: Can you tell if one is Inverted?
I like the answers you two gave me. I have one more question: Can you tell by looking which wave is right side up? There isn't really a "right side up". Sound as we hear it is "air vibrations". The waveform in Audacity represents those vibrations as a wiggly line. Depending on w...
Re: Editing
You need to split the recording into separate files. You can do this by placing labels at the start of each 'song' and then using "Export Multiple". More details here: http://manual.audacityteam.org/man/splitting_a_recording_into_separate_tracks.html If you intend to make an audio CD, the ...
- Sat Aug 20, 2016 9:06 am
- Forum: Making Music with Audacity
- Topic: My First Song With Audacity :))
- Replies: 10
- Views: 1799
Re: My First Song With Audacity :))
Congratulations, that came out pretty well didn't it. Which parts did you use Audacity for? What else did you use? Did you create the backing track yourself? A bit of critical feedback that I hope will be helpful: You've got a bit of clipping in a few places, for example at 1:52.5, so you need to be...