How would you handle the fact that noise profiles only work for one specific sample rate?waxcylinder wrote: ↑Mon Jun 03, 2019 4:03 pmIt would be jolly nice if Audacity could save a noise profile for you - better still if it could save several named ones - for redeployment later
Search found 59476 matches
- Mon Jun 03, 2019 5:23 pm
- Forum: macOS
- Topic: Saving a sample file for Noise Reduction Profile?
- Replies: 9
- Views: 286
Re: Saving a sample file for Noise Reduction Profile?
- Mon Jun 03, 2019 4:33 pm
- Forum: Windows
- Topic: What is .wav (obsolete)?
- Replies: 3
- Views: 238
Re: What is .wav (obsolete)?
That's interesting DVDdoug. It appears that Microsoft have done a turnaround. Windows XP didn't support 24-bit WAV with "WAVE_FORMAT_EXTENSIBLE". Without 3rd party add-ons it only supported 24-bit WAV with the older "WAVE_FORMAT_PCM" standard. Current versions of Windows Media Pl...
- Mon Jun 03, 2019 3:16 pm
- Forum: General Audio Programming
- Topic: mod-script-pipe
- Replies: 25
- Views: 13384
Re: mod-script-pipe
There's a free command line tool called "PipeList" available (32 and 64-bit versions available) from https://live.sysinternals.com/ If you run this tool before launching Audacity, you should see a list similar to this: Pipe Name Instances Max Instances --------- --------- ------------- Ini...
- Mon Jun 03, 2019 2:12 pm
- Forum: macOS
- Topic: 2.3.2 would not export 3.3 gb wav file
- Replies: 4
- Views: 284
Re: 2.3.2 would not export 3.3 gb wav file
what workarounds would be best? Reduce the sample rate. If you think you can hear above 20 kHz, use a sample rate of 48 kHz. Background: Double blind tests have consistently shown that music recorded at 44.1 kHz sample rate is indistinguishable from the same music, recorded with the same equipment,...
- Mon Jun 03, 2019 12:33 pm
- Forum: macOS
- Topic: Saving a sample file for Noise Reduction Profile?
- Replies: 9
- Views: 286
Re: Saving a sample file for Noise Reduction Profile?
Export the noise sample as 32-bit float.
- Mon Jun 03, 2019 12:25 pm
- Forum: Windows
- Topic: What is .wav (obsolete)?
- Replies: 3
- Views: 238
Re: What is .wav (obsolete)?
"24-bit WAV" is not obsolete. They are widely used in professional studios. 24-bit WAV is less widely supported than 16-bit WAV, and you may well find that some "consumer grade" applications don't support 24-bit WAV. To export as 16-bit WAV, select the "Export as WAV" o...
- Mon Jun 03, 2019 12:14 pm
- Forum: Macros and Scripting
- Topic: batch process / chain / macro = 2 questions
- Replies: 9
- Views: 647
Re: batch process / chain / macro = 2 questions
Probably easier to use dedicated format conversion software or Foobar2000.bomber1978 wrote: ↑Mon Jun 03, 2019 5:05 amI don't want to change anything else, just simply convert 24/96 to 16/44.1 all at once...
- Mon Jun 03, 2019 12:09 pm
- Forum: Macros and Scripting
- Topic: batch process / chain / macro = 2 questions
- Replies: 9
- Views: 647
Re: batch process / chain / macro = 2 questions
The sample rate of exported files is set by the "Project Rate" (see: https://manual.audacityteam.org/man/sel ... .html#rate)
You can set the project rate using the "Set Project" command.
The Macro "Export as WAV" command exports as 16-bit WAV.
You can set the project rate using the "Set Project" command.
The Macro "Export as WAV" command exports as 16-bit WAV.
- Mon Jun 03, 2019 10:58 am
- Forum: Nyquist
- Topic: Should I learn Nyquist programming?
- Replies: 19
- Views: 1582
Re: Should I learn Nyquist programming?
what I want to do: LPfilter-flip-LPfilter-flip You can do that like this (well actually, the code below does "flip -> filter -> flip -> filter", but same effect): You will probably find it an instructive exercise to look up all of the functions in this code in the Nyquist / XLisp manuals ...
- Mon Jun 03, 2019 10:49 am
- Forum: Nyquist
- Topic: Should I learn Nyquist programming?
- Replies: 19
- Views: 1582
Re: Should I learn Nyquist programming?
Let me give an example: (setf val 10) (* 2 val) (+ 1 val) Question: What is the "return value" of this code? Let's look at the wrong reasoning first: Line 1: We set VAL to 10 Line 2: We doubled VAL, producing 20 Line 3: We added 1, producing 21 The reason this is wrong is that in line 2, y...