Audacity Forum

Gale Andrews wrote:I've merged the two topics to lessen the confusion.

Could I impose on you to un-merge these two topics and just completely eliminate the topic I had hidden away. That code has nothing to do with batch processing and does not help Steve so probably will not help you.

Is this likely to have any effect on Linux where currently beeps don't work at all in Audacity? It might as I was getting negative values from the math when it should have been positive. Audacity does not use a "system" beep but instead plays a wxSound constructed from an array or wave fi...

Here is a new patch which I think addresses all the questions and concerns. It works for both "current project" and "to files"; it also honors the "duration" setting in both instances and plays the "named in preferences" soundbite if it is there. It uses the &...

In debugging my code to add Beep to chains I noticed some potentially troubling math in the Progress Dialog code. Here is a very simple patch which might cure the problem: =================================================================== --- src/widgets/ProgressDialog.cpp (revision 12339) +++ src/...

Does beep work on your machine "Hardware beep" works on my machine Hmm, I know the Audacity beep is not supposed to be a hardware beep, but you have hardware beep like I used to, and for you it works... I could write a little tiny app built on wxWidgets which does nothing but play a speci...

Does beep work on your machine Setting BeepFileName in audacity.cfg does not help either. "Hardware beep" works on my machine but the "beep" that Audacity uses has nothing to do with that it is a wxWidgets function that just plays a sound; in the Audacity default the sound is ma...

Since Batch Processing does not use the default Progress Dialog it does not give an audible signal when it is done processing. The attached patch adds this ability when applying a chain to a file list; I chose not to add the signal when applying a chain to a single project, if this feature is desire...

steve wrote: Is this new behaviour of automatically zooming to fit the project preferable?

Very helpful patch--I have something similar in my custom build but it adds everything to a single track. I like the terminal zoom-to-fit.

Steve,

We had a major storm here and the power was out for a long time. I still have no internet at home and only an iPad with a poor cell contection for the web but no e-mail access. I'm not ignoring y'all <grin>!

I skipped right to 02a; grabbed a fresh copy of SVN HEAD, before patching compiled both Release and Unicode Release (to ensure no recent commit broke the compile); applied the patch and compiled both Release and Unicode Release successfully. Would it be better to move this to ErrorDialog.cpp along w...