Search found 46 matches
- Sun Dec 09, 2018 10:16 pm
- Forum: Windows
- Topic: Saving (exporting) to non-Wav is needlessly tedious
- Replies: 45
- Views: 1474
Re: Saving (exporting) to non-Wav is needlessly tedious
Actually, I just googled the issue and it says NOT to simply change that Projected Rate, which is only for playback. It said to find "Resample" under "Tracks".
- Sun Dec 09, 2018 10:13 pm
- Forum: Windows
- Topic: Saving (exporting) to non-Wav is needlessly tedious
- Replies: 45
- Views: 1474
Re: Saving (exporting) to non-Wav is needlessly tedious
To me, changing the sample rate is a big deal. I'm doing it now, changing a 4-hr wav from 48000 to 44100, and will take about 8 min. But there's nothing talking about this conversion in the GUI anywhere (that is, it doesn't label anything as being "Change sample rate" or something). Can you assure m...
- Sun Dec 09, 2018 9:50 pm
- Forum: Windows
- Topic: Saving (exporting) to non-Wav is needlessly tedious
- Replies: 45
- Views: 1474
Re: Saving (exporting) to non-Wav is needlessly tedious
Thanks. Will check it out. While we're here, can you please tell me where I look to find the feature to convert my loaded file from 48k to 44.1k sampling rate? I don't see anything like it in "Effects".
- Sun Dec 09, 2018 9:18 pm
- Forum: Windows
- Topic: Saving (exporting) to non-Wav is needlessly tedious
- Replies: 45
- Views: 1474
Re: Saving (exporting) to non-Wav is needlessly tedious
I wouldn't use Audacity for "merely" converting the file type. I'd use a format converter such as LameDropXP or Foobar2000 (both free applications). This avoids the unnecessary intermediate conversions from WAV -> Audacity Project (32-bit float format data) -> MP3. Hi Steve. I downloaded both. I've...
- Sun Dec 09, 2018 8:56 pm
- Forum: Windows
- Topic: Saving (exporting) to non-Wav is needlessly tedious
- Replies: 45
- Views: 1474
Re: Saving (exporting) to non-Wav is needlessly tedious
I had suggested a checkbox, but other systems include a dropdown where the default value is *.flac (in this case) or *.mp3. And the other value in the dropdown is "all file types"... Actually, before I reported the situation, I had looked for such an option under preferences. If such a switch was t...
- Sun Dec 09, 2018 8:52 pm
- Forum: Windows
- Topic: Saving (exporting) to non-Wav is needlessly tedious
- Replies: 45
- Views: 1474
Re: Saving (exporting) to non-Wav is needlessly tedious
Thank you all for the insightful replies. Yes, I realize this is a freebie, so should not expect the kind of support that one might expect from a giant like Microsoft or something.
- Tue Dec 04, 2018 4:37 pm
- Forum: Windows
- Topic: Saving (exporting) to non-Wav is needlessly tedious
- Replies: 45
- Views: 1474
Re: Saving (exporting) to non-Wav is needlessly tedious
I believe my problem came up when editing a "raw" 4 hour .wav, i did trimming, normalizing, etc. Then saved (exported) back to .wav with a carefully built "long name" (not approaching 240, but way more than 8.3). Then in theory, I should dump my project (I don't need a "project", I just work with a ...
- Tue Dec 04, 2018 4:30 pm
- Forum: Windows
- Topic: Saving (exporting) to non-Wav is needlessly tedious
- Replies: 45
- Views: 1474
Re: Saving (exporting) to non-Wav is needlessly tedious
Very long file names are also risky if you ever use devices (such as thumb drives) that often have a maximum length for the full "file path + file name" of around 255 characters. Yes, I ran into that problem in 1997 when I found that the Novell file server I was accessing had 255 limit INCLUDING fu...
- Tue Dec 04, 2018 4:27 pm
- Forum: Windows
- Topic: Saving (exporting) to non-Wav is needlessly tedious
- Replies: 45
- Views: 1474
Re: Saving (exporting) to non-Wav is needlessly tedious
Example: You have a .wav file with a 100-character filename. You merely want to convert it (via Audacity) to MP3. I wouldn't use Audacity for "merely" converting the file type. I'd use a format converter such as LameDropXP or Foobar2000 (both free applications). This avoids the unnecessary intermed...
- Tue Dec 04, 2018 4:21 pm
- Forum: Windows
- Topic: Saving (exporting) to non-Wav is needlessly tedious
- Replies: 45
- Views: 1474
Re: Saving (exporting) to non-Wav is needlessly tedious
You have a .wav file with a 100-character filename I wouldn't use such extreme length file names. If I need to store information about a file, I'd use metadata (which is what metadata tags are designed for). I just checked around my drive. I regular use (and need to use) filenames length 90 (includ...