Search found 6294 matches
- Thu May 13, 2010 11:08 pm
- Forum: Audio Processing
- Topic: MP3 Advantage
- Replies: 12
- Views: 2260
Re: MP3 Advantage
But you seem to get more in the left channel, Think i prefer the dual mono, If more sound is coming from one side on a mono track check the Left-Right slider is in the middle ("Pan: Centre") ... Left-Right slider.png Like you mentioned previously 44100Hz is the norm and perhaps that would be the be...
- Thu May 13, 2010 5:14 pm
- Forum: Windows
- Topic: Problem recording From Vinyl
- Replies: 8
- Views: 1873
Re: Problem recording From Vinyl
When we try to record through the line in audacity is not picking up the music. It does pick it up through the microphone socket, but it is very loud and distorted, even with the volume turned right down. It sounds like on your old configuration you could record from line-in, which gave a good qual...
- Thu May 13, 2010 4:28 pm
- Forum: Audio Processing
- Topic: Changing Voice from Male to Female
- Replies: 7
- Views: 20387
Re: Changing Voice from Male to Female
Cutting back the low frequencies (below 300Hz) using Audacity's graphic equaliser may help.
Attached before-after example: pitch raised by 10%, bass frequencies cut ...
Attached before-after example: pitch raised by 10%, bass frequencies cut ...
- Thu May 13, 2010 3:40 am
- Forum: Audio Processing
- Topic: Can anyone name this sound/voice effect?
- Replies: 10
- Views: 4786
Re: Can anyone name this sound/voice effect?
how would one/what effects would someone use to do what you suggested with adding and layering multiple effects to obtain that result? and can it be done with just audacity? For a demon type voice … Drop pitch by 15%, (i.e. -15%), (Optional : slow speed by 5%) Bassboost 150Hz by 10db Delay: delay t...
- Thu May 13, 2010 12:03 am
- Forum: Audio Processing
- Topic: Can anyone name this sound/voice effect?
- Replies: 10
- Views: 4786
Re: Can anyone name this sound/voice effect?
A 192KHz sample rate is excessive and a huge waste of memory and download time, 44.1KHz will capture all the audio on your sample(2)... sample2.mp3 Screaming bee have software (£$) which does something similar ... http://www.screamingbee.com/SoundClips/LichGuy.mp3 http://www.screamingbee.com/soundcl...
- Sun May 09, 2010 7:44 pm
- Forum: Recording Equipment
- Topic: Recording Problems
- Replies: 2
- Views: 896
Lexicon lamba ? (Lexicon make an "omega" too).stevethefiddle wrote:I tried to find that on Google but no dice. Who's the manufacturer? can you post a link to their web site.Lboogiegohrd wrote:my lambda omega interface
- Sun May 09, 2010 2:42 pm
- Forum: Audio Processing
- Topic: MP3 Advantage
- Replies: 12
- Views: 2260
Re: MP3 Advantage
how did you know it was 12khz? Audacity has “Analyze” options, click on “Analyze” then “plot spectrum” and you get this on your original “03201230” track Dads_Army_'[email protected]_48000Hz.png.png The audio only reaches 12KHz, but as you used a 48000Hz sample rate capable of recording ultrasonic frequen...
- Sun May 09, 2010 3:07 am
- Forum: Recording Techniques
- Topic: notch filter?
- Replies: 11
- Views: 2161
Re: notch filter?
I'm not sure why I'm getting that particular frequency. Below is the frequency analysis of your "notch needed" mp3 from 0.2 to 0.4 seconds ... 'notch needed' from 0,2 to 0,4 seconds.png It shows broadband noise which runs across the entire spectrum form 20Hz to 20,000Hz. It is not one "particular f...
- Sun May 09, 2010 12:27 am
- Forum: Audio Processing
- Topic: MP3 Advantage
- Replies: 12
- Views: 2260
Re: MP3 Advantage
it seems that i have a stereo recording from the streaming audio I think what you've got is "dual mono": the two tracks are absolutely identical, so not really stereo. You can just discard one of these two tracks: split to mono and click on the"x" in the top left of one of the tracks to delete it. ...
- Sat May 08, 2010 2:47 pm
- Forum: Audio Processing
- Topic: MP3 Advantage
- Replies: 12
- Views: 2260
Re: MP3 Advantage
You can't technically improve on the original recording by making a copy with a higher Kbps converting from 192Kbs to 320kbs would sound the same but the files would be significantly bigger. It is possible to make fake stereo ( pseudstereo ) from a mono track which can sound subjectively better than...