Audacity Forum

I have audacity 2.1.2
I don't remember if I got the zip or not.

All I want to do is make a small piece of vocal sounds, birdcalls maybe - for half a minute maybe - and then repeat that for half an hour

Then burn a cd of it.

can't figure out how to do it.

anyone can help?



ab

Thank you for that. I'll get onto it.

I had a great big .wav of many tunes which I used Audacity to cut into many little .wavs, one for each tune. Exported them. Labelled them and exported by label. Made a .cue with imgburn of some of them and burned it. Made another with the rest and burned. Lovely. But I forgot to normalise before I d...

Thanks for the idea. I'm working with it. Haven't got the hang of it yet.

I change the speed with no apparent effect sometimes...

Using Win7. Audacity 2.0.6 When I put up a click track it's often not exactly at the speed I want - generally need to slow it down because I'm attempting something I can't play at that speed. So I have to keep generating new click tracks at different speeds. It'd be good if I could just pause for a ...

I think this might be a 'wine glass effect' situation.

I should have posted a link a long time ago.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DIBT6E2GtjA

Can't a good line on the 'shape' of the echo be got from sampling the end of a 'period' when the echo is all you have? On my particular recording there's many different sounds to look at: short words and long words/phrases, perhaps even exclamations, perhaps even furniture sounds and periods of sile...

Yes, I saw that way of putting it some time ago, when it was first posted I guess. I don't think it is quite accurate. It is an amusing dramatisation of the situation with much truth in it but as it stands it is more or less a conundrum pointing to an impossibility. Which in fact is not what we have...

Thanks for that. Very interesting. Looks to me like the problem, one way or the other, must have had some very high powered thinkers and machines applied to it and I'd be very surprised if it hasn't been cracked to a large extent. Just how computationally intensive that 'crack' is I don't know and d...

Surprises me. I would have thought it the first remedial function to have been worked out - and I'd have thought it fairly easy to work out, too. Because of the predictability of it. Surely? The time delay will be a constant? So you know when to look. And then the sound is equally predictable, surel...