Btw. maybe it should be mentioned somewhere in the wiki that those Nyquist filters are not suitable for editing sections of a track
Search found 8 matches
- Thu Jun 09, 2011 7:36 pm
- Forum: General Feedback and Discussion
- Topic: Low/high-pass phase shift
- Replies: 3
- Views: 2034
Re: Low/high-pass phase shift
OK, I see, thank you. I used the equalizer for that purpose and that did it. But now I miss the analogue warmth.. 
Btw. maybe it should be mentioned somewhere in the wiki that those Nyquist filters are not suitable for editing sections of a track
Btw. maybe it should be mentioned somewhere in the wiki that those Nyquist filters are not suitable for editing sections of a track
- Thu Jun 09, 2011 2:56 pm
- Forum: General Feedback and Discussion
- Topic: Normalization of stereo tracks
- Replies: 10
- Views: 4666
Re: Normalization of stereo tracks
You are right, but it is checked by default.
- Thu Jun 09, 2011 2:54 pm
- Forum: General Feedback and Discussion
- Topic: Low/high-pass phase shift
- Replies: 3
- Views: 2034
Low/high-pass phase shift
The high and low pass filters in Audacity are not linear phase. Is this itentional (e.g. is there any situation where this could be desirable)? I wanted to apply a high pass to a short selection of a track to get rid of some rumbling noise but this introduced really nasty artifacts at the borders of...
- Thu Jun 09, 2011 2:45 pm
- Forum: General Feedback and Discussion
- Topic: Normalization of stereo tracks
- Replies: 10
- Views: 4666
Re: Normalization of stereo tracks
I'll do. I think it would be the best solution to include a checkbox for independent l/r normalization like Cool Edit has
- Mon Jun 06, 2011 6:57 pm
- Forum: General Feedback and Discussion
- Topic: Normalization of stereo tracks
- Replies: 10
- Views: 4666
Normalization of stereo tracks
I just noticed that when normalizing a stereo track Audacity does seem to normalize both stereo channels independently. I'm not sure whether this a bug or a "feature"? If it is the latter I would seriously recommend to change that quirky behaviour. It's contrary to what any other standard audio edit...
- Fri Jun 03, 2011 6:20 pm
- Forum: General Feedback and Discussion
- Topic: Odd statement in Audacity manual
- Replies: 8
- Views: 1922
Re: Odd statement in Audacity manual
This could give the wrong impression that higher sample rates than 40kHz (or 44.1?) are generally called "over sampling", Oversampling is defined on Wikipedia as "In signal processing, oversampling is the process of sampling a signal with a sampling frequency significantly higher than twice the ban...
- Fri Jun 03, 2011 11:53 am
- Forum: General Feedback and Discussion
- Topic: Odd statement in Audacity manual
- Replies: 8
- Views: 1922
Re: Odd statement in Audacity manual
You have posted in the 1.3 section of the Forum, so I'm puzzled why you are reading the now ancient 1.2 manual. The 1.3 manual can be read here: http://manual.audacityteam.org/man/Main_Page This is what the 1.3 manual cuuremly says on CDs: http://manual.audacityteam.org/man/Audio_CDs And this is th...
- Thu Jun 02, 2011 11:01 am
- Forum: General Feedback and Discussion
- Topic: Odd statement in Audacity manual
- Replies: 8
- Views: 1922
Odd statement in Audacity manual
Hi there, when reading through the Audacity manual I stumbled over the following statement which seems quite irritating to me: the dynamic range on an audio CD is theoretically about 90 dB, but realistically signals that are -24 dB or more in volume are greatly reduced in quality http://audacityteam...