Audacity Forum

@Whomper: I fully I agree, especially the photoshop analogy is a good one. If your project is finished after recording, there may not be many benefits in recording in higher sample rates, but if you edit the track and especially if there are multiple parallel tracks, the sound really is better becau...

Thanks, but shouldn't at least 44.1 kHz work normally then? And while I agree that small differences like 3 ms/m may be a sound card problem, I think 6000 samples in 15 seconds on 88.2 kHz hints to a problem with Audacity itself - it's always only at the beginning of the track. BTW I'm using high sa...

Except for 6 kHz, 12 kHz, 24 kHz, 48 kHz, 96 kHz and 192 kHz, all other sample rates (even 44.1 kHz) lead to different speeds of the recorded track and the original track of about 3 ms per minute, the slower track being the recorded track. Now when I record in 88.2 kHz, something new happens: During...