Audacity Forum

You can read the RS translation wiki article and see, how I've edited it to reflect our current model. Notice how Transifex is labeled as recommended, but not enforced.. It looks enforced to me? No PO or POT files, just TS and QM (whatever they are). That's what RetroShare uses, being a QT applicat...

Given some translators are against or neutral, that only leaves possible benefits to Audacity Team. What do you see as the advantages to Audacity Team of each of the different degrees of integrating the translation effort into Transifex? I fail to grasp why a speculated opposing stance of some indi...

Do people on Audacity Team even need to use tx pull? What would happen if we said - no you have to decide when the .po files are ready and send them to (or advise a download link to) the mailing list as now? Transifex is then irrelevant to the developers. If translators of some locales find it easi...

There was no developer support for moving to Transifex so it won't happen. But was there developer opposition? It looks like you are the one doing the commits from what I can tell browsing the list archives, so I would think your opinion has some impact? No developer comment usually implies opposit...

There was no developer support for moving to Transifex so it won't happen. But was there developer opposition? It looks like you are the one doing the commits from what I can tell browsing the list archives, so I would think your opinion has some impact? Thanks for posting about the MediaWiki trans...

There has been discussion on the mailing list ( part 2 of discussion ) about making the translation process more efficient with the help of Transifex . I'm posting here, because I don't use mailing lists myself. One of the first comments was: "But I don't feel comfortable using a non GPL tool, ...