So you are editing audiobooks for more enjoyable listening, without plosives and so on? If so could you be even called a “producer”? You aren’t the original producer.
Perhaps it should be title of “Audiobook Production” with subtitle “Community blog for recording and editing of audiobooks”?
Exactly. It’s the generic term. The producer causes the show to exist. At one end the producer can be the announcer, recordist, editor, etc. etc. At the other, they write a check and stand back.
OK. Obviously I do, as I suggested it a few posts ago.
I had suggested a title of “Audiobook Production” with subtitle “Community blog for recording and editing of audiobooks”.
That’s if people do edit other rights holders’ work, having purchased the book from Amazon. Or is this only about producing for ACX? Should ACX be in the subtitle? Probably yes.
Certainly Librivox and others should be welcome to the party. We could mention Librivox and others in the subtitle as well if we wanted to. Or just keep it generic. But in that case we still have to decide what the subtitle text should be.
It seems to me that people needing help with recording techniques are mostly ACX users, because of the exacting ACX requirements.
What about editing of an audiobook that one purchases? Is that a rare case? Should that go in “Audiobook Production” or “Audio Processing”?
No kidding? There is DRM protecting the books I get via Audible. I could play them on the computer and capture system audio in Audacity if I really wanted to but that would take some time.