stevethefiddle wrote:BeatleWho wrote:so then am I reading correctly that the external files, etc., is only an issue if you have NOT saved the project?
I think that's missing the real issue.
Audacity has 2 methods of importing audio files.
1) To copy the file into the project - this is the safe option and importing compressed (for example MP3 files) is always done this way.
2) To read the audio data directly from the file without copying the whole file. This is faster and uses less disk space (no copying is done during the import) but there is a risk that if you save the project and delete the audio file that you "imported", then there may be data missing from your project (because it was not copied into the project data folder). Recent versions of Audacity give several warning about this and (by default) asks if you want to copy these files (if there are any). Older versions of Audacity were not so helpful.
OK, I think I see what you are driving at. FYI if I didn't mention it I'm running 1.2.4 currently.
Pretty much everything was saved in each project folder. To excess, I suspect some might say.

I have a somewhat "pack rat" mentality and my computer habits tend to be no different. And particularly when it comes to stuff that I record, it's like each step is valuable so it gets saved and given a name; I guess my gut tells me that if I ever want to re-mix or re-do something the more original material I have the better job of it I can do. Does it eat disk space, eeeyup - sure does !!!!! We're looking at options including a second mongo HD internal as well as an external HD for storage like one of these 1 terabyte jobbies. So THAT doesn't really need to be *fast* per se; just needs to hold a lot.
For me it's a mix of things including a bunch of stuff from Audacity. The wife does digital photography and this too eats a lot of HD space. Lots of "stuff" could be "held" in an external drive and gotten OFF the c: drive where windows and the active programs do their work. There is no doubt that as we have gotten more and more on c: things have slowed down
noticeably. Spreading stuff out would also give some flexibility in the backup process......by having less on each drive, it means that whenever you back up THAT drive you have less to back up...which means less time, fewer DVD's. etc.
I noticed recently that the backup software also (apparently) supports Blu-Ray single layer and I *think* it said one of these discs can hold 25 GB???? That's like around 6 regular DVD's if my numbers are correct......not sure about the write speed, will have to look that up but I could see some advantages there.
(In the meantime, still trying to find folks who have used PreSonus Firebox which seems to be the #1 candidate right now and get their reviews.......which was the whole point of the exercise

)
Duane